Miscellaneous Quiz / Sec 1A Torts Cases

Random Miscellaneous Quiz

Can you name the Case name?

Quiz not verified by Sporcle

Forced Order
Score 0/77 Timer 15:00
cannot recover for loss of enjoyment of life w/o cog. awareness
Jury should decide if airline is negligent for falling luggage
causation: must show reasonable certainty for cause
fungible product: liability by market share
legal, but inherently dangerous activity: liable
release form for ski resort unenforceable
warnings: enough to say 'serious injury' don't need to be specific
Suing your parents is OK
no licensee/invitee distinction: both reasonable care
expert med testimony --> causation
financial harm: no knowledge of particular use, therefore no duty
Jury decides reasonable precautions for crossing train tracks
Negligent entrustment = not ok
bible study group: licensee not invitee
Common carriers required to exercise reasonable care NOT extraordinary care
extreme event: only reasonable for damages that were foreseeable
state of the art: ex ante approach
constructive notice of danger --> negligence
mental distress: dillon standard
danger is obvious and necessary--> assumption of risk
Standard of care: get out of car, look/listen for trains
conscious disregard for others --> punitive damages
duty to fetus which will result in a child
econ harm: if foreseeable, can recover
punitive: single-digit multiplier
spare tire flew off truck = res ipsa
safety statute = negligence per se; rule of the road doesn't
GM design defect, but P was responsible too
Duty to protect patrons on commercial prop? Balancing test
qualified immunity for govt
Falling barrel = res ipsa
no proof of elapsed time --> no constructive notice
Med Mal: national standard > similar localities test
firefighter rule doesn't apply beyond premises liability
B < PL
Applies Birkner test for scope of employment --> vicarious liability
Baller scientist gets disfigured: high non-pecuniary damages upheld
knowingly encountering a risk created by D --> secondary assumption of risk
FDA requires waning--> exception to learned intermediary doctrine
Docs: no comparative negligence for Ps
Therapist has duty to protect threatened victim
No liability when result would be crushing liability
careless + some foreseeable harm = responsible for all resulting harm
'shocks the conscious' --> overrule compensatory damages
complex product: use risk/utility
SL for products
shift burden for causation to Ds in special cases
bring something onto land -->mischief-->you're responsible
No special relationship --> no aff duty
failure to follow industry standard doesn't establish negligence
foreseeability: probable consequences standard
No lights on buggy: negligence per se
established: lawful act + ordinary care = no liability
motorcycle w/ no leg guards --> design defect
defective design for autos: compare to other similar models
products: rejects privity; duty of care to end users
Non-commercial social host has no duty towards 3rd parties injured by drunk minors
res ipsa to smoke out which doc was negligent
no relationship if far away --> no duty
negligent sterilization: limited-recovery rule; but if birth defects, special expenses
mental distress: lack of physical manifestation OK; standard: ordinary sensitive person
drinking buddies --> special relationship; start helping --> special relationship
Med experts can testify --> educate jury about med mal res ipsa
govt employee: ministerial/discretionary distinction
police: no duty re: specific threats
Adequate precautions against foreseeable risks = no liability
road surface, lack of signs: discretionary act -->liablity
rape behind untrimmed hedges: not foreseeable
mental suffering: doesn't require physical impact, but does require physical manifestation
Chem spill: use negligence, not SL
econ harm: surrounding businesses can't recover lost profits
Eggshell P rule
Asbestos: physical contact =/= physical impact
Dillon standard doesn't apply to mother + kidnapped baby in hospital
Independent contractor: Apparent Auhority --> vicarious liability
false information --> liable for resulting harm
when statute: private action must be consistent w/ legislative scheme

You're not logged in!

Compare scores with friends on all Sporcle quizzes.
Sign Up with Email
Log In

You Might Also Like...

Show Comments


Top Quizzes Today

Score Distribution

Your Account Isn't Verified!

In order to create a playlist on Sporcle, you need to verify the email address you used during registration. Go to your Sporcle Settings to finish the process.