Miscellaneous Quiz / Sec 1A Torts Cases

Random Miscellaneous Quiz

QUIZ: Can you name the Case name?

Quiz not verified by Sporcle

Forced Order
Challenge
Share
Tweet
Embed
Score 0/77 Timer 15:00
HoldingCase
careless + some foreseeable harm = responsible for all resulting harm
bible study group: licensee not invitee
Med experts can testify --> educate jury about med mal res ipsa
Independent contractor: Apparent Auhority --> vicarious liability
Suing your parents is OK
drinking buddies --> special relationship; start helping --> special relationship
Therapist has duty to protect threatened victim
spare tire flew off truck = res ipsa
qualified immunity for govt
no licensee/invitee distinction: both reasonable care
Duty to protect patrons on commercial prop? Balancing test
Common carriers required to exercise reasonable care NOT extraordinary care
conscious disregard for others --> punitive damages
Non-commercial social host has no duty towards 3rd parties injured by drunk minors
Chem spill: use negligence, not SL
when statute: private action must be consistent w/ legislative scheme
defective design for autos: compare to other similar models
failure to follow industry standard doesn't establish negligence
knowingly encountering a risk created by D --> secondary assumption of risk
extreme event: only reasonable for damages that were foreseeable
GM design defect, but P was responsible too
Jury decides reasonable precautions for crossing train tracks
expert med testimony --> causation
Docs: no comparative negligence for Ps
established: lawful act + ordinary care = no liability
complex product: use risk/utility
HoldingCase
SL for products
Applies Birkner test for scope of employment --> vicarious liability
rape behind untrimmed hedges: not foreseeable
econ harm: if foreseeable, can recover
'shocks the conscious' --> overrule compensatory damages
govt employee: ministerial/discretionary distinction
release form for ski resort unenforceable
motorcycle w/ no leg guards --> design defect
shift burden for causation to Ds in special cases
Standard of care: get out of car, look/listen for trains
res ipsa to smoke out which doc was negligent
B < PL
No special relationship --> no aff duty
negligent sterilization: limited-recovery rule; but if birth defects, special expenses
mental distress: lack of physical manifestation OK; standard: ordinary sensitive person
Eggshell P rule
danger is obvious and necessary--> assumption of risk
firefighter rule doesn't apply beyond premises liability
road surface, lack of signs: discretionary act -->liablity
foreseeability: probable consequences standard
Med Mal: national standard > similar localities test
No liability when result would be crushing liability
No lights on buggy: negligence per se
Negligent entrustment = not ok
state of the art: ex ante approach
Jury should decide if airline is negligent for falling luggage
HoldingCase
warnings: enough to say 'serious injury' don't need to be specific
duty to fetus which will result in a child
FDA requires waning--> exception to learned intermediary doctrine
Adequate precautions against foreseeable risks = no liability
financial harm: no knowledge of particular use, therefore no duty
no relationship if far away --> no duty
mental suffering: doesn't require physical impact, but does require physical manifestation
Falling barrel = res ipsa
products: rejects privity; duty of care to end users
constructive notice of danger --> negligence
police: no duty re: specific threats
Dillon standard doesn't apply to mother + kidnapped baby in hospital
fungible product: liability by market share
Asbestos: physical contact =/= physical impact
causation: must show reasonable certainty for cause
punitive: single-digit multiplier
no proof of elapsed time --> no constructive notice
bring something onto land -->mischief-->you're responsible
safety statute = negligence per se; rule of the road doesn't
econ harm: surrounding businesses can't recover lost profits
legal, but inherently dangerous activity: liable
mental distress: dillon standard
Baller scientist gets disfigured: high non-pecuniary damages upheld
false information --> liable for resulting harm
cannot recover for loss of enjoyment of life w/o cog. awareness

You're not logged in!

Compare scores with friends on all Sporcle quizzes.
Sign Up with Email
OR
Log In

You Might Also Like...

Show Comments

Extras

Top Quizzes Today


Score Distribution

Your Account Isn't Verified!

In order to create a playlist on Sporcle, you need to verify the email address you used during registration. Go to your Sporcle Settings to finish the process.