Question | Answer |
Regarding innocent misrepresentation, which statute and section describes: 'gives court discretion to award damages instead of recision if it feels contract should continue' | |
Presumed Undue Influence | |
What is the name of the statue where 'seller of goods has a voidable title to them, but his title has not been voided at the time of the sale, the buyer acquires a title to goods' | |
Mistake of Identity of Subject Matter | |
Name a case where the usefulness of the defendants actions helped him be found not liable | |
Regarding negligent misrepresentation, which statute and section describes: 'court can award damages and/or recision; such an action shifts burden of proof onto Def' | |
What test is this 'courts take into account feelings of victim and what he genuinely believes' | |
Case where it was too late for CLM to recover car because an innocent third party had obtained title | |
Latin name for 'no harm can be done to a willing person' | |
Company once vicariously liable and once not | |
Name the case (non solicitors) where pure economic loss claim did suceed | |
Case regarding Duress | |
Case where def's actions were purely incidental to job but def still liable | |
2 cases where def was on a frolic of his own | |
Gruesome murder taken place in house | |
Described troubling tenant as 'most desirable' | |
In what case was it determined consumers are neighbours of manufacturers | |
Plea of Non Est Factum failed | |
There was no obligation for party to check accuracy so contract could be rescinded for misrepresentation | |
Mistaken identity was important so no consensus ad idem | |
In what case was it established the person giving advice does not need to be an expert | |
Hare skins | |
Name the leading case in deciding there should be no duty of care for pure economic loss only | |
True statements which subsequently become untrue | |
What act is contributory negligence based on | |
Case where accepting lift from drunk driver not consenting to risks | |
Breakthrough case duty of care was owed for negligent advice even if only resulted in pure economic loss | |
Case where acting on instinct does not count as genuinly accepting the risks | |
Case outlining damages redutctions for not wearing a seatbelt | |
Name the case the Caparo test was formed | |
Name the case where there was more than one cause of loss (only one was negligence) | |
Divorcee applying for post as governess for CLM's children | |
Comments