Religion Quiz / Ethics: Meta-Ethics (Philosophers)

Random Religion Quiz

Meta-Ethics (Philosophers)

 Plays Quiz not verified by Sporcle

Score 0/6 Timer 02:00
Argued against ethical naturalism
Discussed the moral claim 'ought' by saying that no definition can be given to this word
Argued that it was obvious that certain types of actions, which he called prima facie duties, were right
Said that 'ethical terms do not serve only to express feelings; they are calculated also to arouse feeling, and so to stimulate action'
Gave a more detailed version of emotivism in his book Ethics and Language
Attacked the distinction between facts and values

You're not logged in!

Compare scores with friends on all Sporcle quizzes.
Join for Free
Log In

You Might Also Like...

Show Comments


Created Jun 6, 2017ReportFavoriteNominate

Top Quizzes Today

Score Distribution

Your Account Isn't Verified!

In order to create a playlist on Sporcle, you need to verify the email address you used during registration. Go to your Sporcle Settings to finish the process.

Report this User

Report this user for behavior that violates our Community Guidelines.