Just For Fun Quiz / Cases for Con Law 1

Random Just For Fun Quiz

QUIZ: Can you name the Cases for Con Law 1?

Quiz not verified by Sporcle

Forced Order
Score 0/55 Timer 10:00
HoldingCase name
Separation of powers big case with jackson's concurrence
Cannot tell a state executive branch how to enforce state laws
If the task is not within the original power of the states they do not have it now
Can regulate states in the same way as regulate private
An interpretation of the constitution carries the weight of the constitution
If contest enemy status and American citizen the at least entitled to a neutral judge
If admit to enemy status the constitution does not extend the right to a jury trial
An example of category 1 of presidential power - action has happened over a long time so consent
Necessary and proper clause is the convenient useful and proper clause
Home processing example
Delegation doctrine have to have legislative purpose and guidelines
If there is any executive power then congress cannot remove
Has to be an economic activity for congress to regulate it in interstate commerce
Big preemption case
An interpretation of the equal protections clause is not a political question
Example of meeting de facto discrimination
Congress cannot change what the constitution gives
Political question six factor test
Hamilton said power to tax must be used to provide for the general welfare of the state
Regulating medicinal weed is economic activity
Dormant commerce clause exception 1
The most important habeas case
Under habeas look if presidential power is allowed under jackson's concurrence
Privilege cannot be based on a generalized interest
If want to sue a state for money have to use what amendment
Any legislative action has to go through presentment and bicameralism
SCOTUS has judicial review over state cases
Dormant commerce clause exception 3
HoldingCase name
Impeachment is a political question
Incentives no punishment when regulating a state only activity
Limitations on the spending power
A president's official acts while sitting are always immune
The preamble of the constitution is not a source of law
Discrimination cases
If congress appoints then officered can only do legislative activities
SCOTUS has the power to review acts of congress
Line item veto act did not provide guidelines
If the act was not within official acts then no immunity
Will the restriction on removal impede the president's power
Court can determine qualifications for house representatives
Removed the manufacturing distinction
Balancing test used in de facto discrimination
President has the power to terminate a treaty unilaterally is a political question
The commerce clause is not around to require states to exercise their police power to prevent unfair competition
A political question is about not stepping on the toes of other branches
Guns in school zones and 3 areas congress may regulate
Example of meeting strict scrutiny
Now it comes down to whether the activity places a substantial economic effect on interstate commerce
Federal courts have no jurisdiction over enemy aliens held outside the USA
Any official with executive power must be removable by the president OR someone that the president can remove at will
Dormant commerce clause exception 2
Congress has exclusive power to regulate undesirable interstate commerce
Current law in dormant commerce clause is no discrimination
States have to listen to the holdings of SCOTUS
Guantanamo bay is now USA territory

You're not logged in!

Compare scores with friends on all Sporcle quizzes.
Sign Up with Email
Log In

You Might Also Like...

Show Comments


Top Quizzes Today

Score Distribution

Your Account Isn't Verified!

In order to create a playlist on Sporcle, you need to verify the email address you used during registration. Go to your Sporcle Settings to finish the process.