Biggest WWE Draws Of All-Time Quiz

Javascript is not currently enabled on your browser.
If you do have Javascript enabled:
This site uses javascript to make the magic happen.
Please turn on javascript and reload this page, or use a more current browser (like Firefox)

You might also like these games:
Undertaker Opponents	WWE Double Champions	WWE Hulk Hogan's PPV Opponents

There are 25 comments for this game.
(Warning: comments may contain spoilers)

Biggest WWE Draws Of All-Time Quiz

by zurby

Created Nov 28, 2009 in Sports
Game Plays 7,727

Friend Scores and Standings

Loading friend results....

Top Games Today in Sports

Top Games with Similar Tags

Top User Games in Sports

Comment below threshold: show it

	zurby:	Nov 28th, 2009 at 06:00 GMT		7 points
	this is based on a collection of information like attendances, main events, ppvs, etc. It's a statistical calculation. Ric Flair never spent enough time in the WWE to be in the top 20. He came in at #34.

	JustEd:	Nov 28th, 2009 at 09:03 GMT		6 points
	evansigg + jgrangers2 = marks

	Kooch:	Nov 28th, 2009 at 14:41 GMT		8 points
	omg where is savio vega? where were YOU during the blackout? Seriously though Flair was there from late 91-early 93, then didnt come back again until late 2001. By that time he was too far past his prime to be considered a serious draw or a threat. Warrior sucked and business was down after he won.

Comment below threshold: show it

	drewSID:	Nov 28th, 2009 at 22:04 GMT		0 points
	I know this is based on some kind of formula, so I don't blame zurby, but any list that doesn't have Hulk Hogan as the biggest draw of all-time is flawed.

	CitizenSnips:	Nov 28th, 2009 at 23:02 GMT		2 points
	I would be very interested in seeing the methodology used here. Austin, at his peak, was a bigger draw than Hogan or anyone else. But Hogan has had much more time on top.

	zurby:	Nov 28th, 2009 at 23:20 GMT		1 point
	I'm searching for the original article right now, for some reason I'm having trouble finding it. When found, I'll post all of the criteria that was used. Meltzer did note in the article that if he were still wrestling today, he would be #2 on the list.

	fletchman03:	Nov 28th, 2009 at 23:48 GMT		3 points
	HHH over Rock AND Austin?!?! Where the hell is Jericho?

	zurby:	Nov 29th, 2009 at 00:05 GMT		1 point
	HHH has been maineventing for 10 years now. Rock was maineventing the WWE for 5 years, and Austin was maineventing for about 5 as well. Jericho came in tied at #30.

	poopswatch:	Nov 29th, 2009 at 07:24 GMT		2 points
	Miguel Perez? like... like the Boriquas?

	RushTheater:	Nov 30th, 2009 at 17:05 GMT		3 points
	I'm pretty sure the Miguel Perez here is the father of the Boriquas guy.

	samoarowe:	Nov 30th, 2009 at 20:25 GMT		1 point
	Can't believe I forgot Bret. Good quiz!

	FsF:	Dec 26th, 2009 at 20:20 GMT		-2 points
	Good quiz! Great to see Big Dave finally represented here on Sporcle~!

	championvenom:	Jun 14th, 2010 at 13:49 GMT		-1 points
	She may not have been a main event, and maybe not top 20, but i would guess Sable might be close to this.

	RoaringElbow:	Jul 11th, 2010 at 04:08 GMT		-1 points
	I got 19 out of 21. I should have known Rocca, but I wouldnt have ever got Perez. Good quiz, very original

	ithkrall:	Jul 22nd, 2010 at 12:02 GMT		1 point
	"this is based on a collection of information like attendances, main events, ppvs, etc" I don't recall PPVs being around when the great Bruno Sammartino was wrestling. Yes, he held the belt forever, but that was when WWE was a regional show. Hogan, Taker and HHH would all have been seen by far more people, and sold far more product than Sammartino. Just seems an odd system they have used.

	abernier3:	Nov 14th, 2011 at 09:26 GMT		1 point
	can't have austin below hhh or undertaker. i argue he should be top 3 but that's debatable. rock has gotta be higher than hhh too...undertaker and rock are close. and hhh and hbk should be about even.

	unfitfinlay:	Dec 19th, 2011 at 22:35 GMT		2 points
	I can't remember the exact formula Meltzer used but it was along the lines of "Who drew the most money, that they could possibly draw" in which case Sammartino likely does deserve to be top, given that he consistantly sold out places like Madison Square Garden for more than a decade. It also took into account the length of time someone was a draw for, which accounts for the relatively low placing of Rock and Austin. Yes, they were major major draws but only for a relatively short space of time. Compare that to the length of time that the Undertaker and Triple H have been headlining and their placings make a lot more sense.

	Happ_Hazzard:	Mar 17th, 2012 at 17:12 GMT		-4 points
	Davey Boy Smith should be here. He main evented the highest attended WWF event of all time.

Comment below threshold: show it

	unfitfinlay:	Jul 27th, 2012 at 22:37 GMT		2 points
	They make perfect sense. Flair had a short run as a headliner in the early 90's at a time when business was in the toilet and was used largely as a Manager when he returned in the 2000s. Regardless of what he did elsewhere he simply wasn't a consistant draw for any length of time in WWE.

	joehemmings:	Jan 31st, 2013 at 16:09 GMT		1 point
	This is a quiz that can't be argued about. You want to get mad, get mad at Meltzer. As has been said this is based on specific criteria (We just don't know what the criteria is exactly). Therefore you can't really complain, those that drew the most people is not a sliding scale, and not based on what you think.

	Adyman:	Apr 27th, 2013 at 17:29 GMT		2 points
	If you scored between the 50th-75th percentile, you're a normal wrestling fan. If you scored between 90th-99th percentile, you're a smart wrestling fan. But if you got all of them, you are a wrestling genius.