Can you name the numbers (1 to 5) in each box correctly to complete this Futoshiki puzzle? by vikZ

Can you name the numbers (1 to 5) in each box correctly to complete this Futoshiki puzzle?

created by vikZ

Enter a number in the box below
Correctly named numbers will show up below
Click any empty num or ber to answer for that location
Some wrong answers will appear in red
Futoshiki is very similar to Sudoku. You have to fill the boxes with numbers (1-5). No number can appear twice in any given row or column. In addition, the inequalities on the board must hold as well.
A reminder on how inequalities work; The larger number is on the side of the open end. Example: 4 > 3.
Also try: Nonogram Puzzle
This quiz has not been verified by Sporcle

Popular trivia games today

Famous with Sunglasses

2383

Isn't It Ironic?

1599

World Capital Border Blitz

1383

One-word Movie Mix-and-Match

1105

Word Ladder: Gemstones

949

Missing Word: Top Grossing Movies (1990)

920

Clickable 1-100 Mines

884

Facebook Relationship Status

665

And more...

PLAY GAME

06:00

Show Missed Answers


＞

∨

∨
＜


＞

∨

∧

∧

Javascript is not currently enabled on your browser.
If you do have Javascript enabled:
This site uses javascript to make the magic happen.
Please turn on javascript and reload this page, or use a more current browser (like Firefox)

You might also like these games:
Literary Math	Odd Number Out	Fun With 1234

There are 18 comments for this game.
(Warning: comments may contain spoilers)

Futoshiki Puzzle II Quiz

by vikZ

Created Jan 24, 2013 in Just For Fun
Game Plays 1,986

Friend Scores and Standings

Loading friend results....

Top Games Today in Just For Fun

Top Games with Similar Tags

Top User Games in Just For Fun

	charliep1973:	Jan 24th, 2013 at 08:32 GMT		8 points
	Fun, but somewhat on the easy side. I didn't have to make notes or hold anything in my head with this one.

	alastor:	Jan 24th, 2013 at 09:54 GMT		3 points
	It's inequalities, not equalities...

	Ubbiebubbie:	Jan 24th, 2013 at 19:57 GMT		1 point
	The time could be shortened considerably.

	TheCleverone:	Jan 24th, 2013 at 20:25 GMT		0 points
	I agree with the above comments, but fun all the same.

	vikZ:	Jan 24th, 2013 at 20:45 GMT		1 point
	Thanks for the comments, I made all the quick fixes and I reduced the time by 4 minutes. It's hard to tell how much time to give since I don't know how fast people will pick up how they can use the inequality signs to find numbers. I would like some feedback: What do you people think of the quiz not being a minefield? I figure people don't want to redo the puzzle over and over so I just left it with wrong answers. But does anyone have any personal thoughts on it? The only thing I don't like right now is for some reason, when a wrong answer is given on certain boxes, the formatting gets slightly wonky.

	mrpotwtf69:	Jan 24th, 2013 at 20:58 GMT		1 point
	I can't see the letters or numbers on top of the boxes. They appear as 205F inside a rectangle for me. Is there a plugin of some kind I need to be able to see them. Here's what I see: http://i.imgur.com/EKz20DS.png

	vikZ:	Jan 24th, 2013 at 21:25 GMT		2 points
	@mrpotwtf69 Hmm that's really odd. You're not really missing any information though. All those little rectangles are just supposed to be blanks (they're there because every box needs a unique hint to not get grouped together).

	Ubbiebubbie:	Jan 24th, 2013 at 21:44 GMT		1 point
	I think this could and should be a minefield. As long as you take it sort of slow and think through all of the steps that you should be taking, you should be fine anyway.

	selene314:	Jan 27th, 2013 at 06:07 GMT		2 points
	The rectangles you're using as spacers are confusing. I spent some time trying to figure out what they were, and then I missed one of the inequalities hidden in them.

	Remember_snood:	Jan 28th, 2013 at 22:42 GMT		6 points
	Should be a minefield, great quiz.

	shorlin:	Jan 29th, 2013 at 14:24 GMT		1 point
	Current time works well. I hadn't seen played this type of puzzle before at all, but I got it with 30 secs to spare. I think it work work well as a minefield.

	hibernia:	Jan 29th, 2013 at 15:22 GMT		1 point
	I have no idea how you're supposed to start that one without some guessing.

	brez002:	Jan 29th, 2013 at 15:34 GMT		0 points
	I'm not quite sure how you do this without guessing either. Could someone explain it? Or could you put up a solution or something?

	vikZ:	Jan 29th, 2013 at 16:47 GMT		6 points
	@Selene314 Well they're blanks. You're not supposed to see rectangles. Your computer or operating system or something isn't recognizing the blanks for some reason. My problem with making this a minefield though is that 1) First it only matters when someone enters a wrong number. 2) If it's a minefield, that means they have to repeat the quiz and re-enter all the numbers just to get back to where they were. 3) I can just not make it a minefield and they will be at that same spot without re-entering numbers without any hassle. 4) Also I think it'd be nice to not have EVERY logic puzzle be a minefield. @hibernia and brez002 Look at the 3rd row and realize that 5 cannot be less than any number. And last but not least, thank you druhutch for the EP!

	tallerpat:	Jan 29th, 2013 at 18:11 GMT		3 points
	For hibernia and brez: You have to understand the < and >. If you don't understand the < and >, I suggest you read the instructions.

	TheCleverone:	Jan 30th, 2013 at 16:00 GMT		1 point
	Much better now. Mind you, it was five globes before, so I think that Sporcle needs to implement a sixth.

	DRB:	Jan 30th, 2013 at 16:54 GMT		1 point
	Good quiz...I'm used to seeing these puzzles with 6 rows and columns though, so spent ages trying to figure out where to start before realising there were only 5!

	beachybum28:	Feb 13th, 2013 at 01:03 GMT		2 points
	Anyone else notice the black dots-optical illusion between the rectangles?