| Love the idea, but why, for example, do the Rochester and Cincinnati Royals get lumped together but separately from the Kansas City and Sacramento Kings, even though they are the same franchise? The goal is not to identify all the nicknames but all the teams. So either Rochester/Cincinnati/Kansas City/Sacramento all go together as the same franchise or they each get listed separately because they are distinctly different teams. Personally, I would vote for the latter. After all, it would be easy to get the Atlanta Hawks, but how many people know they started in Milwaukee? |