 | wiggytitch: | Aug 28th, 2012 at 16:45 GMT | | 4 points |
| Tough, but enjoyable. |
 | Wezzo: | Sep 21st, 2012 at 13:02 GMT | | 2 points |
| Finally did it on my tenth try, with one second left. That was tough! |
 | ArtVandaley: | Sep 21st, 2012 at 18:45 GMT | | 4 points |
| These clickable blitz quizzes are frustrating because you are trying to click so fast that sometimes your click does not register. |
Game published: Feb 22nd, 2013 at 04:00 GMT
 | fp_atl: | Feb 22nd, 2013 at 08:00 GMT | | 5 points |
| Finally got it with 9 seconds left on my 8th try. |
 | TheCleverone: | Feb 22nd, 2013 at 08:38 GMT | | 31 points |
| In theory, the prime numbers should make it easier. In reality, you still lose anyway. |
 | mic747: | Feb 22nd, 2013 at 09:07 GMT | | 17 points |
| I think this quiz could be improved by turning it the other way around, expression in top bar, answers clickable. I spend all my time looking for expressions while i knew what it was. |
 | singin185: | Feb 22nd, 2013 at 09:51 GMT | | 8 points |
| It'd be nice to be able to skip a question and come back to it. I spent so much time scanning for an answer I already knew. |
 | teddy109768: | Feb 22nd, 2013 at 10:33 GMT | | 4 points |
| I kinda wish they all just said 1x___ because then I would have had a chance |
 | gloucester: | Feb 22nd, 2013 at 12:30 GMT | | 5 points |
| That was a lot of frustrating fun! Great idea. |
 | thebrax4: | Feb 22nd, 2013 at 13:55 GMT | | 6 points |
| half of the craziness of this one is that you have to look for the same expression both ways. i don't know how much time i spent trying to find 1x3... fun quiz! |
 | hydran87: | Feb 22nd, 2013 at 15:34 GMT | | 1 point |
| Much easier on a touch device (e.g. iPad). |
 | djfoams: | Feb 22nd, 2013 at 15:50 GMT | | 3 points |
| Sounds easier than it actually was. I could have swore the author left out 7x2. |
 | Sackgirl: | Feb 22nd, 2013 at 18:08 GMT | | 3 points |
| Thanks for not using decimals :D |
 | MyNameIsAndrew: | Feb 22nd, 2013 at 21:41 GMT | | -4 points |
| I think the time limit is too short. I am sure most users know the equations for the numbers but waste time searching for the equation. Also, some numbers can have two equations (ex: 9 could be 3x3 or 9x1) which made me wonder which equation was used in the list of equations. |
 | peterpan55: | Feb 22nd, 2013 at 21:51 GMT | | 6 points |
| I think this quiz is less a test of how fast you can do your multiplication tables, and more how fast you can scan through 30 buttons. If the intention of the creator was to test the former, why not put the equations in numerical order? |
 | curtisziraa: | Feb 23rd, 2013 at 00:13 GMT | | 1 point |
| 1 second to spare on the 9th time. Oof. |
 | hazelorb: | Feb 23rd, 2013 at 00:17 GMT | | 1 point |
| I made a similar quiz to this when matching quizzes came out and everyone was hating on the time limit. You match two equivalent multiplication expressions. |
 | _DB: | Feb 23rd, 2013 at 16:29 GMT | | 3 points |
| I think it would work better as a typing quiz or if the answers were in some sort of order (maybe randomize the numbers that come up on top and have the answers in ascending order by first digit or something similar). As is, (for me at least) it was just a test of how quickly I could scan through and click which was made difficult by my trackpad, not the quiz. |
 | Metalmarsh89: | Feb 24th, 2013 at 15:22 GMT | | 3 points |
| I am definitely much better at math than this quiz shows. |
 | sccatluvr: | Feb 25th, 2013 at 20:03 GMT | | 0 points |
| Unless I'm totally blind and overlooked it at least ten times, there's nothing for the number 4! |
 | tajeri: | May 15th, 2013 at 10:42 GMT | | 1 point |
| I thought the time limit was fine, finished with 10 seconds to spare on my second attempt. Very enjoyable, 24 caught me out, hunting for 6x4 for far too long! |