Sec 1A Torts Cases

Random Miscellaneous Quiz

Can you name the Case name?

Quiz not verified by Sporcle

embed
 plays        
How to Play
HoldingCase
bring something onto land -->mischief-->you're responsible
careless + some foreseeable harm = responsible for all resulting harm
release form for ski resort unenforceable
B < PL
No lights on buggy: negligence per se
Common carriers required to exercise reasonable care NOT extraordinary care
Falling barrel = res ipsa
firefighter rule doesn't apply beyond premises liability
Independent contractor: Apparent Auhority --> vicarious liability
drinking buddies --> special relationship; start helping --> special relationship
fungible product: liability by market share
Asbestos: physical contact =/= physical impact
complex product: use risk/utility
SL for products
bible study group: licensee not invitee
Dillon standard doesn't apply to mother + kidnapped baby in hospital
no relationship if far away --> no duty
res ipsa to smoke out which doc was negligent
Chem spill: use negligence, not SL
econ harm: if foreseeable, can recover
extreme event: only reasonable for damages that were foreseeable
warnings: enough to say 'serious injury' don't need to be specific
defective design for autos: compare to other similar models
Med Mal: national standard > similar localities test
knowingly encountering a risk created by D --> secondary assumption of risk
duty to fetus which will result in a child
HoldingCase
danger is obvious and necessary--> assumption of risk
when statute: private action must be consistent w/ legislative scheme
legal, but inherently dangerous activity: liable
Docs: no comparative negligence for Ps
Med experts can testify --> educate jury about med mal res ipsa
negligent sterilization: limited-recovery rule; but if birth defects, special expenses
no proof of elapsed time --> no constructive notice
mental suffering: doesn't require physical impact, but does require physical manifestation
road surface, lack of signs: discretionary act -->liablity
Non-commercial social host has no duty towards 3rd parties injured by drunk minors
no licensee/invitee distinction: both reasonable care
Jury should decide if airline is negligent for falling luggage
Therapist has duty to protect threatened victim
false information --> liable for resulting harm
products: rejects privity; duty of care to end users
Applies Birkner test for scope of employment --> vicarious liability
established: lawful act + ordinary care = no liability
Standard of care: get out of car, look/listen for trains
Suing your parents is OK
conscious disregard for others --> punitive damages
Jury decides reasonable precautions for crossing train tracks
safety statute = negligence per se; rule of the road doesn't
Eggshell P rule
rape behind untrimmed hedges: not foreseeable
shift burden for causation to Ds in special cases
state of the art: ex ante approach
HoldingCase
cannot recover for loss of enjoyment of life w/o cog. awareness
FDA requires waning--> exception to learned intermediary doctrine
foreseeability: probable consequences standard
econ harm: surrounding businesses can't recover lost profits
'shocks the conscious' --> overrule compensatory damages
mental distress: dillon standard
motorcycle w/ no leg guards --> design defect
No special relationship --> no aff duty
financial harm: no knowledge of particular use, therefore no duty
expert med testimony --> causation
punitive: single-digit multiplier
GM design defect, but P was responsible too
Adequate precautions against foreseeable risks = no liability
qualified immunity for govt
failure to follow industry standard doesn't establish negligence
spare tire flew off truck = res ipsa
Duty to protect patrons on commercial prop? Balancing test
mental distress: lack of physical manifestation OK; standard: ordinary sensitive person
govt employee: ministerial/discretionary distinction
causation: must show reasonable certainty for cause
No liability when result would be crushing liability
Negligent entrustment = not ok
Baller scientist gets disfigured: high non-pecuniary damages upheld
police: no duty re: specific threats
constructive notice of danger --> negligence

Friend Scores


  Player Best Score Plays Last Played
You You haven't played this game yet.

You Might Also Like...

Extras

Created Dec 13, 2010ReportNominate
Tags:case, holding, sec, tort