Sec 1A Torts Cases

Random Miscellaneous Quiz

Can you name the Case name?

Quiz not verified by Sporcle

How to Play
mental distress: lack of physical manifestation OK; standard: ordinary sensitive person
econ harm: surrounding businesses can't recover lost profits
expert med testimony --> causation
Jury decides reasonable precautions for crossing train tracks
defective design for autos: compare to other similar models
Med Mal: national standard > similar localities test
safety statute = negligence per se; rule of the road doesn't
state of the art: ex ante approach
No special relationship --> no aff duty
causation: must show reasonable certainty for cause
No lights on buggy: negligence per se
mental distress: dillon standard
bring something onto land -->mischief-->you're responsible
Dillon standard doesn't apply to mother + kidnapped baby in hospital
duty to fetus which will result in a child
spare tire flew off truck = res ipsa
false information --> liable for resulting harm
fungible product: liability by market share
conscious disregard for others --> punitive damages
negligent sterilization: limited-recovery rule; but if birth defects, special expenses
bible study group: licensee not invitee
Med experts can testify --> educate jury about med mal res ipsa
road surface, lack of signs: discretionary act -->liablity
no licensee/invitee distinction: both reasonable care
extreme event: only reasonable for damages that were foreseeable
res ipsa to smoke out which doc was negligent
govt employee: ministerial/discretionary distinction
foreseeability: probable consequences standard
qualified immunity for govt
Adequate precautions against foreseeable risks = no liability
punitive: single-digit multiplier
Jury should decide if airline is negligent for falling luggage
shift burden for causation to Ds in special cases
drinking buddies --> special relationship; start helping --> special relationship
Common carriers required to exercise reasonable care NOT extraordinary care
Falling barrel = res ipsa
SL for products
Chem spill: use negligence, not SL
Duty to protect patrons on commercial prop? Balancing test
no proof of elapsed time --> no constructive notice
Eggshell P rule
Asbestos: physical contact =/= physical impact
No liability when result would be crushing liability
Applies Birkner test for scope of employment --> vicarious liability
B < PL
warnings: enough to say 'serious injury' don't need to be specific
rape behind untrimmed hedges: not foreseeable
'shocks the conscious' --> overrule compensatory damages
products: rejects privity; duty of care to end users
no relationship if far away --> no duty
Suing your parents is OK
Therapist has duty to protect threatened victim
established: lawful act + ordinary care = no liability
cannot recover for loss of enjoyment of life w/o cog. awareness
Baller scientist gets disfigured: high non-pecuniary damages upheld
firefighter rule doesn't apply beyond premises liability
when statute: private action must be consistent w/ legislative scheme
knowingly encountering a risk created by D --> secondary assumption of risk
FDA requires waning--> exception to learned intermediary doctrine
Docs: no comparative negligence for Ps
constructive notice of danger --> negligence
mental suffering: doesn't require physical impact, but does require physical manifestation
Standard of care: get out of car, look/listen for trains
motorcycle w/ no leg guards --> design defect
careless + some foreseeable harm = responsible for all resulting harm
complex product: use risk/utility
econ harm: if foreseeable, can recover
police: no duty re: specific threats
failure to follow industry standard doesn't establish negligence
legal, but inherently dangerous activity: liable
release form for ski resort unenforceable
Independent contractor: Apparent Auhority --> vicarious liability
danger is obvious and necessary--> assumption of risk
Negligent entrustment = not ok
GM design defect, but P was responsible too
Non-commercial social host has no duty towards 3rd parties injured by drunk minors
financial harm: no knowledge of particular use, therefore no duty

Friend Scores

  Player Best Score Plays Last Played
You You haven't played this game yet.

You Might Also Like...


Created Dec 13, 2010ReportNominate
Tags:case, holding, sec, tort