Sec 1A Torts Cases

Random Miscellaneous Quiz

Can you name the Case name?

Quiz not verified by Sporcle

How to Play
Challenge
Share
Tweet
Embed
HoldingCase
extreme event: only reasonable for damages that were foreseeable
Eggshell P rule
econ harm: if foreseeable, can recover
constructive notice of danger --> negligence
shift burden for causation to Ds in special cases
cannot recover for loss of enjoyment of life w/o cog. awareness
Docs: no comparative negligence for Ps
Common carriers required to exercise reasonable care NOT extraordinary care
Chem spill: use negligence, not SL
careless + some foreseeable harm = responsible for all resulting harm
defective design for autos: compare to other similar models
state of the art: ex ante approach
econ harm: surrounding businesses can't recover lost profits
Med Mal: national standard > similar localities test
knowingly encountering a risk created by D --> secondary assumption of risk
no proof of elapsed time --> no constructive notice
mental suffering: doesn't require physical impact, but does require physical manifestation
failure to follow industry standard doesn't establish negligence
Jury should decide if airline is negligent for falling luggage
Negligent entrustment = not ok
bring something onto land -->mischief-->you're responsible
Dillon standard doesn't apply to mother + kidnapped baby in hospital
no relationship if far away --> no duty
causation: must show reasonable certainty for cause
Jury decides reasonable precautions for crossing train tracks
B < PL
HoldingCase
negligent sterilization: limited-recovery rule; but if birth defects, special expenses
false information --> liable for resulting harm
no licensee/invitee distinction: both reasonable care
Baller scientist gets disfigured: high non-pecuniary damages upheld
bible study group: licensee not invitee
punitive: single-digit multiplier
complex product: use risk/utility
duty to fetus which will result in a child
when statute: private action must be consistent w/ legislative scheme
expert med testimony --> causation
govt employee: ministerial/discretionary distinction
Falling barrel = res ipsa
'shocks the conscious' --> overrule compensatory damages
Duty to protect patrons on commercial prop? Balancing test
conscious disregard for others --> punitive damages
foreseeability: probable consequences standard
firefighter rule doesn't apply beyond premises liability
spare tire flew off truck = res ipsa
Therapist has duty to protect threatened victim
Applies Birkner test for scope of employment --> vicarious liability
No special relationship --> no aff duty
release form for ski resort unenforceable
No liability when result would be crushing liability
Non-commercial social host has no duty towards 3rd parties injured by drunk minors
Standard of care: get out of car, look/listen for trains
Independent contractor: Apparent Auhority --> vicarious liability
HoldingCase
police: no duty re: specific threats
road surface, lack of signs: discretionary act -->liablity
FDA requires waning--> exception to learned intermediary doctrine
Suing your parents is OK
safety statute = negligence per se; rule of the road doesn't
financial harm: no knowledge of particular use, therefore no duty
rape behind untrimmed hedges: not foreseeable
SL for products
qualified immunity for govt
danger is obvious and necessary--> assumption of risk
res ipsa to smoke out which doc was negligent
products: rejects privity; duty of care to end users
established: lawful act + ordinary care = no liability
Med experts can testify --> educate jury about med mal res ipsa
Asbestos: physical contact =/= physical impact
GM design defect, but P was responsible too
legal, but inherently dangerous activity: liable
motorcycle w/ no leg guards --> design defect
fungible product: liability by market share
No lights on buggy: negligence per se
mental distress: lack of physical manifestation OK; standard: ordinary sensitive person
Adequate precautions against foreseeable risks = no liability
warnings: enough to say 'serious injury' don't need to be specific
drinking buddies --> special relationship; start helping --> special relationship
mental distress: dillon standard

You're not logged in!

Compare scores with friends on all Sporcle quizzes.
Sign Up with Email
OR
Log In

You Might Also Like...

Show Comments

Extras


Your Account Isn't Verified!

In order to create a playlist on Sporcle, you need to verify the email address you used during registration. Go to your Sporcle Settings to finish the process.