Sec 1A Torts Cases

Random Miscellaneous Quiz

Can you name the Case name?

Quiz not verified by Sporcle

How to Play
Score 0/77 Timer 15:00
HoldingCase
warnings: enough to say 'serious injury' don't need to be specific
Med experts can testify --> educate jury about med mal res ipsa
Duty to protect patrons on commercial prop? Balancing test
release form for ski resort unenforceable
police: no duty re: specific threats
motorcycle w/ no leg guards --> design defect
Non-commercial social host has no duty towards 3rd parties injured by drunk minors
No special relationship --> no aff duty
fungible product: liability by market share
constructive notice of danger --> negligence
established: lawful act + ordinary care = no liability
Eggshell P rule
foreseeability: probable consequences standard
danger is obvious and necessary--> assumption of risk
Med Mal: national standard > similar localities test
Jury decides reasonable precautions for crossing train tracks
state of the art: ex ante approach
legal, but inherently dangerous activity: liable
shift burden for causation to Ds in special cases
defective design for autos: compare to other similar models
mental distress: lack of physical manifestation OK; standard: ordinary sensitive person
complex product: use risk/utility
bring something onto land -->mischief-->you're responsible
expert med testimony --> causation
careless + some foreseeable harm = responsible for all resulting harm
econ harm: surrounding businesses can't recover lost profits
HoldingCase
Standard of care: get out of car, look/listen for trains
rape behind untrimmed hedges: not foreseeable
false information --> liable for resulting harm
econ harm: if foreseeable, can recover
No lights on buggy: negligence per se
negligent sterilization: limited-recovery rule; but if birth defects, special expenses
Docs: no comparative negligence for Ps
res ipsa to smoke out which doc was negligent
safety statute = negligence per se; rule of the road doesn't
conscious disregard for others --> punitive damages
spare tire flew off truck = res ipsa
causation: must show reasonable certainty for cause
Therapist has duty to protect threatened victim
mental distress: dillon standard
Chem spill: use negligence, not SL
FDA requires waning--> exception to learned intermediary doctrine
Baller scientist gets disfigured: high non-pecuniary damages upheld
Dillon standard doesn't apply to mother + kidnapped baby in hospital
Jury should decide if airline is negligent for falling luggage
B < PL
Negligent entrustment = not ok
road surface, lack of signs: discretionary act -->liablity
duty to fetus which will result in a child
Falling barrel = res ipsa
when statute: private action must be consistent w/ legislative scheme
Asbestos: physical contact =/= physical impact
HoldingCase
punitive: single-digit multiplier
cannot recover for loss of enjoyment of life w/o cog. awareness
Independent contractor: Apparent Auhority --> vicarious liability
firefighter rule doesn't apply beyond premises liability
mental suffering: doesn't require physical impact, but does require physical manifestation
SL for products
Common carriers required to exercise reasonable care NOT extraordinary care
no licensee/invitee distinction: both reasonable care
drinking buddies --> special relationship; start helping --> special relationship
no relationship if far away --> no duty
products: rejects privity; duty of care to end users
'shocks the conscious' --> overrule compensatory damages
Adequate precautions against foreseeable risks = no liability
GM design defect, but P was responsible too
No liability when result would be crushing liability
Suing your parents is OK
Applies Birkner test for scope of employment --> vicarious liability
financial harm: no knowledge of particular use, therefore no duty
extreme event: only reasonable for damages that were foreseeable
no proof of elapsed time --> no constructive notice
knowingly encountering a risk created by D --> secondary assumption of risk
failure to follow industry standard doesn't establish negligence
bible study group: licensee not invitee
govt employee: ministerial/discretionary distinction
qualified immunity for govt

Friend Scores


  Player Best Score Plays Last Played
You You haven't played this game yet.

You Might Also Like...

Extras

Created Dec 13, 2010ReportNominate
Tags:case, holding, sec, tort