Can you name the MLB Prime 9 Hitting Seasons? by smoggy14

Team	Player	Year
#9 Dodgers		1997 (.362; 40 HR; 142 RBI)
#8 Pirates		1908 (.354; 201 Hits; .957 OPS)
#7 Yankees		1927 (47 HR; 175 RBI)
#6 Yankees		1956 (.353; 52 HR; 130 RBI)
#5 Tigers		1911 (.420; 248 Hits)
#4 Cardinals		1922 (42 HR; 450 Total Bases)
#3 Giants		2001 (73 HR; .863 Slugging; 177 Walks)
#2 Red Sox		1941 (.406; 37 HR; 147 RBI)
#1 Yankees		1921 (59 HR; 171 RBI)

Javascript is not currently enabled on your browser.
If you do have Javascript enabled:
This site uses javascript to make the magic happen.
Please turn on javascript and reload this page, or use a more current browser (like Firefox)

You might also like these games:
MLB Unassisted Triple Plays	MLB Teams Last MVP	Silver Sluggers (First Base)

There are 12 comments for this game.
(Warning: comments may contain spoilers)

MLB Network Prime 9 Hitting Seasons Quiz

by smoggy14

Created Jan 11, 2012 in Sports
Game Plays 1,506

Friend Scores and Standings

Loading friend results....

Top Games Today in Sports

Top Games with Similar Tags

Top User Games in Sports

	Wolfie0890:	Jan 12th, 2012 at 04:51 GMT		2 points
	Might wanna capitalize Mantle. but no biggie. Great Quiz. I'd be interested to see more statistics too.

Comment below threshold: show it

	MFHBoiler:	Jan 12th, 2012 at 12:50 GMT		4 points
	I'd take a good look at Musial in 1948 also. He led the lead in almost everything that year.

	legend930:	Jan 12th, 2012 at 14:21 GMT		-1 points
	Max, I believe MLB network was going for best offensive season at each position.

	RodTidwell:	Jan 12th, 2012 at 14:33 GMT		1 point
	Jeff Bagwell's 1994 season .368, 39 HR, and 116 RBI's would be top 9 if not for the strike. They only played 2/3 of the season, other wise his numbers project to .368, 57, 171. That's just sick.

	RodTidwell:	Jan 12th, 2012 at 14:36 GMT		4 points
	legend930: I don't believe that were going position by position, otherwise you wouldn't have 5 OF and no third baseman.

	deej:	Jan 12th, 2012 at 14:49 GMT		-4 points
	This source is terrible. If they're going for best at each position, there's no 3B. If they're going for top OPS+ (as it says as the only criteria at the top), they skipped a bunch of guys.

	iKNOWall:	Jan 12th, 2012 at 15:10 GMT		4 points
	The MLB network does these shows called prime nine which are top nine lists and that's what this is from. They were doing top nine hitting seasons in history and not by position. I watched it the other day they said that they went mainly by writer's votes and adjusted OPS.

	sox_fan1468927:	Jan 12th, 2012 at 20:25 GMT		1 point
	I would put Ruth's 1920 over his 1921. The league run production as a whole increased dramatically in 1921 (OPS shot up 43 points) so I would say Ruth's offensive output in 1920 was more valuable than his output in 1921.

	mrburns443:	Jan 12th, 2012 at 23:22 GMT		1 point
	#9 had 124 rbis in 1997

	Bobbybaritone:	Jan 13th, 2012 at 00:46 GMT		3 points
	RodTidwell -- Bagwell indeed was phenomenal in 1994, but he was probably the only one in the world who was actually helped by the strike. He had just suffered a season-ending injury and wouldn't have played another game.

	howard38:	May 30th, 2012 at 18:09 GMT		1 point
	I read the explanation given via the link and I still don't understand the criteria. OPS+ is mentioned but most of those guys had higher ones in seasons other than the season listed for them.