Can you name the 20 largest cities of the 'Third Reich' in 1939? by professor88

Javascript is not currently enabled on your browser.
If you do have Javascript enabled:
This site uses javascript to make the magic happen.
Please turn on javascript and reload this page, or use a more current browser (like Firefox)

You might also like these games:
'M' World Metros	'P' World Metros	'H' World Metros

There are 19 comments for this game.
(Warning: comments may contain spoilers)

Germany's largest cities 1939 Quiz

by professor88

Created May 30, 2011 in Geography
Game Plays 898

Friend Scores and Standings

Loading friend results....

Top Games Today in Geography

Top Games with Similar Tags

Top User Games in Geography

	professor88:	May 30th, 2011 at 22:12 GMT		2 points
	Königsberg, Breslau and Vienna are tricky, I know ;-)

	chriskotx:	May 30th, 2011 at 23:21 GMT		0 points
	I think I tried 6 different ways to spell Nurnberg.

	professor88:	May 30th, 2011 at 23:24 GMT		2 points
	@chriskotx: Nuremberg, Nurnberg and Nürnberg are all accepted...

	adrian96:	May 30th, 2011 at 23:43 GMT		-2 points
	Such a random year...

	professor88:	May 31st, 2011 at 00:06 GMT		4 points
	@adrian96: Well, for Germany not random at all -it's the year World War II started.

	toledorockets:	May 31st, 2011 at 01:07 GMT		2 points
	tricked me on Vienna. Forgot about the auschluss

	dancastro:	May 31st, 2011 at 04:46 GMT		3 points
	@toledorockets: it's spelled Anschluss. Ausschluss would be the opposite (getting out of the power of Hitler, something not too easy in 1939).

	ragu:	May 31st, 2011 at 13:30 GMT		1 point
	Where does Danzig fit in with all this?

	driesjes:	May 31st, 2011 at 15:04 GMT		2 points
	Danzig was a free city after WWI I think.

	sluq:	May 31st, 2011 at 16:26 GMT		2 points
	Danzig was annexed in September 1939, shortly after the beginning of the war. I guess it would be useful to amend the description and refer to pre-war borders explicitly.

	professor88:	May 31st, 2011 at 17:44 GMT		2 points
	The city of Danzig had about 260.000 inhabitants in 1939. -Too few for the top 20. But I just added the pre-war description... ;-)

	ragu:	May 31st, 2011 at 19:10 GMT		1 point
	I brought it up as I thought it would have had a larger population than that and I knew it was part of germany by 1939 , apparently in 1934 its population was 383,955, but with everything that went on this obviously must have dropped significantly.

	Choinowski:	May 31st, 2011 at 19:57 GMT		1 point
	I guessed Karl-Marx-Stadt but that was wrong. I guess also that them germans didn't like Karl Marx that much back then. Damn Chemnitz...

	adrian96:	May 31st, 2011 at 21:13 GMT		2 points
	@Professor88 Because I wasn't being sarcastic....

	professor88:	May 31st, 2011 at 22:13 GMT		2 points
	@ragu: What's your source for that number? I think that's not the number for the city of Danzig but for the entire administrative area. Can't imagine it to have dropped that much. @Choinowski: Yeah, it was named K-M-Stadt after Saxony became part of communist East Germany. @adrian96: Ok, now I get it... ;-)

	ragu:	Jun 1st, 2011 at 10:42 GMT		1 point
	That number was taken from the world history KMLA websites page on Danzig, however this Jewish encylopedia site gives the population in 1939 as 449,990 but I dont know whether these are for the whole administrative area or how reliable these type of sources are. http://www.jewishgen.org/yizkor/pinkas_poland/pol6_00033.html

	brittain33:	Jun 1st, 2011 at 22:04 GMT		2 points
	If you want to push the 1939 angle, Lodz, Poland was incorporated into the Third Reich in November 1939 and renamed Litzmannstadt with a population of about 600,000.

	professor88:	Jun 2nd, 2011 at 18:27 GMT		1 point
	@ragu: Yeah, that's in agreement with the numbers I got. The German "Brockhaus" encyclopedia gives ~450.000 for 1939 for the administrative area of Danzig. The city itself was at 260.000 though.

	brittain33:	Jun 2nd, 2011 at 18:52 GMT		1 point
	P.S. just saw "PREWAR BORDERS OF 1939" in your instructions, I'm sorry if it looked like I was doing an unwonted correction above.