Razzie Winners by Critical Drubbing

Random Movies Quiz

Can you name the Razzie Worst Picture winners by critical drubbing?

Quiz not verified by Sporcle

How to Play
Critical DrubbingMovie
Many awful movies are at least funny in a campy sort of way. Bo and John Derek, however, make films so sincerely bad that they offer nothing in the way of relief. (TV Guide)
Pretty much the Showgirls of sci-fi shoot-'em-ups. (Variety)
Director Lyne, whose 'Fatal Attraction' looks celestial by comparison, indulges in such fraudulent morality you assume he's kidding. He isn't. (Washington Post)
Even the ice pick looks like it really doesn't want to be there. (Toronto Star)
One wonders why any actress, even a retired MTV game show hostess, would stoop to such a disgraceful gig. (Newark Star-Ledger)
Isn't so much a narrative film as a cacophonous series of explosions intermittently interrupted by needless dialogue. (Detroit News)
As for the guy(s) in the duck suit . . . well, he/they deserve our condolences and prayers. (Chicago Reader)
Over the long haul, it becomes as oppressively one-note as Clay himself. (Entertainment Weekly)
The only good thing…is that we didn't have to see Parts 1 through 5. (Washington Post)
Get out the kitty litter. (Toronto Star)
All in all, it's a pretty offensive movie, especially to the Americans who fought in Vietnam. (TV Guide)
Easily marks the worst movie Lohan has appeared in and the worst performance she has given. (ReelViews)
A shambles, a space plodessy, a snoozola of astronomic proportions (Washington Post)
To say this megamillion Bruce Willis vehicle doesn't fly is understatement in the extreme. (Washington Post)
Critical DrubbingMovie
Like a Care Bears movie that got waylaid in the fourth dimension. (Christian Science Monitor)
A simplistic melodrama of mushy patriotism, stilted romance and hollow morality. (San Francisco Chronicle)
Is it an exploitation thriller? A farce? A vanity project — Moore's love letter to her own sculpted bod? All three, I'm afraid. (Entertainment Weekly)
A few good tunes, but how self-adoring can a star be? (Kalamazoo Gazette)
The stars display zip chemistry, but seem to find themselves adorable. They're so taken with each other they don't need an audience. (Rolling Stone)
Doesn't push the limits of taste so much as the limits of how bad a movie can be. (Houston Chronicle)
It is unremittingly depressing, not to any purpose of drama or entertainment, but just to depress. It left me feeling creepy. (Roger ****)
If you harbor an interest in watching so-called 'industry smarts' autodestruct, this carries a certain morbid appeal, but that's about the extent of it. (Chicago Reader)
Figures out how to go thud more often, and in more decadently extravagant ways, than just about any would-be blockbuster since ''Hudson Hawk.'' (Entertainment Weekly)
Downright antifunny, an experience that makes you wonder if you will ever laugh again. (New York Times)
Stupid vanity film for Cruise at his worst. (Mountain Xpress)
Approximates the feeling of someone sleazy putting the make on you. Its brand of sexual harassment makes you feel dirty and not at all flattered. (Sacramento Bee)
It's hard to imagine another director ever making his wife look so bad in a major movie. (Arizona Republic)

You're not logged in!

Compare scores with friends on all Sporcle quizzes.
Sign Up with Email
Log In

You Might Also Like...

Show Comments