Razzie Winners by Critical Drubbing

Random Movies Quiz

Can you name the Razzie Worst Picture winners by critical drubbing?

Quiz not verified by Sporcle

embed
 plays        
How to Play
Critical DrubbingMovie
Even the ice pick looks like it really doesn't want to be there. (Toronto Star)
Pretty much the Showgirls of sci-fi shoot-'em-ups. (Variety)
A simplistic melodrama of mushy patriotism, stilted romance and hollow morality. (San Francisco Chronicle)
One wonders why any actress, even a retired MTV game show hostess, would stoop to such a disgraceful gig. (Newark Star-Ledger)
To say this megamillion Bruce Willis vehicle doesn't fly is understatement in the extreme. (Washington Post)
All in all, it's a pretty offensive movie, especially to the Americans who fought in Vietnam. (TV Guide)
The only good thing…is that we didn't have to see Parts 1 through 5. (Washington Post)
As for the guy(s) in the duck suit . . . well, he/they deserve our condolences and prayers. (Chicago Reader)
A shambles, a space plodessy, a snoozola of astronomic proportions (Washington Post)
Get out the kitty litter. (Toronto Star)
Director Lyne, whose 'Fatal Attraction' looks celestial by comparison, indulges in such fraudulent morality you assume he's kidding. He isn't. (Washington Post)
Many awful movies are at least funny in a campy sort of way. Bo and John Derek, however, make films so sincerely bad that they offer nothing in the way of relief. (TV Guide)
It's hard to imagine another director ever making his wife look so bad in a major movie. (Arizona Republic)
Downright antifunny, an experience that makes you wonder if you will ever laugh again. (New York Times)
Critical DrubbingMovie
Stupid vanity film for Cruise at his worst. (Mountain Xpress)
Easily marks the worst movie Lohan has appeared in and the worst performance she has given. (ReelViews)
Over the long haul, it becomes as oppressively one-note as Clay himself. (Entertainment Weekly)
Like a Care Bears movie that got waylaid in the fourth dimension. (Christian Science Monitor)
A few good tunes, but how self-adoring can a star be? (Kalamazoo Gazette)
It is unremittingly depressing, not to any purpose of drama or entertainment, but just to depress. It left me feeling creepy. (Roger ****)
Approximates the feeling of someone sleazy putting the make on you. Its brand of sexual harassment makes you feel dirty and not at all flattered. (Sacramento Bee)
If you harbor an interest in watching so-called 'industry smarts' autodestruct, this carries a certain morbid appeal, but that's about the extent of it. (Chicago Reader)
The stars display zip chemistry, but seem to find themselves adorable. They're so taken with each other they don't need an audience. (Rolling Stone)
Doesn't push the limits of taste so much as the limits of how bad a movie can be. (Houston Chronicle)
Isn't so much a narrative film as a cacophonous series of explosions intermittently interrupted by needless dialogue. (Detroit News)
Figures out how to go thud more often, and in more decadently extravagant ways, than just about any would-be blockbuster since ''Hudson Hawk.'' (Entertainment Weekly)
Is it an exploitation thriller? A farce? A vanity project — Moore's love letter to her own sculpted bod? All three, I'm afraid. (Entertainment Weekly)

You're not logged in!

Compare scores with friends on all Sporcle quizzes.
Sign Up with Email
OR
Log In

You Might Also Like...

Show Comments

Extras