MLB Teams In Order Based On Their Win-Loss Record For The Past Decade (2001-2010) Quiz by pgrossma

Can you name the MLB Teams In Order Based On Their Win-Loss Record For The Past Decade (2001-2010)?

created by pgrossma

Enter a MLB Team in the box below
Correctly named MLB Teams will show up below
Click any empty Wins-Losses or MLB Team to answer for that location
Source: MLB.com
Note: Some teams do not play exactly 162 games per year because tie breaker games count as regular season games and some rain outs are only made up if the games will effect playoff races.
This quiz has not been verified by Sporcle

Popular trivia games today

'#' Movies by Picture

2452

Shortest Country Name per Letter

2340

Color Sequence Memory Game

1361

True or False Logic Quiz

839

Big Adjectives

716

Word Ladder: Here's Johnny

692

Symbol Match Minefield

604

Missing Word: 3-Letter Movie Words

549

And more...

PLAY GAME

05:00

Show Missed Answers

Wins-Losses	MLB Team	Win %
981-636		0.607
924-695		0.571
906-714		0.559
904-715		0.558
888-730		0.549
888-733		0.548
882-737		0.545
880-739		0.544
856-764		0.528
850-767		0.526
850-771		0.524
836-783		0.516
829-789		0.512
812-807		0.502
807-812		0.498

Wins-Losses	MLB Team	Win %
807-813		0.498
800-818		0.494
795-825		0.491
795-825		0.491
795-826		0.490
785-835		0.485
770-851		0.475
757-863		0.467
745-874		0.460
731-889		0.451
721-897		0.446
713-906		0.440
690-928		0.426
669-948		0.414
662-958		0.409

Javascript is not currently enabled on your browser.
If you do have Javascript enabled:
This site uses javascript to make the magic happen.
Please turn on javascript and reload this page, or use a more current browser (like Firefox)

You might also like these games:
MLB #1 Draft Picks	MLB Win Leaders by Team	MLB Most Wins by Decade

There are 16 comments for this game.
(Warning: comments may contain spoilers)

MLB Team Rankings 2001-2010 Quiz

by pgrossma

Created Oct 15, 2010 in Sports
Game Plays 3,322

Friend Scores and Standings

Loading friend results....

Top Games Today in Sports

Top Games with Similar Tags

Top User Games in Sports

	pgrossma:	Oct 15th, 2010 at 21:33 GMT		6 points
	Do people feel this is an appropriate amount of time for this quiz? I had a hard time determining what the timer should be set to.

	sunshine423:	Oct 16th, 2010 at 07:39 GMT		2 points
	I like the time. I didn't finish when I was trying to guess randomly and I finished with time to spare when I tried again.

	jmarshallg:	Oct 17th, 2010 at 08:28 GMT		7 points
	The Mariners sure did what they could to nullify that 116 win season. I was also mildly surprised the Marlins had a winning record but that's what consistent mediocrity does I guess.

	LinuxLinus:	Oct 17th, 2010 at 21:05 GMT		2 points
	I think it's a good amount of time.

	Westbranch:	Oct 17th, 2010 at 23:23 GMT		0 points
	Heh, and the Red Sox said that the Yankees were the 'Evil Empire' - bit of pot calling the kettle black there, eh?

	nowaybrah77:	Oct 18th, 2010 at 01:01 GMT		2 points
	hah yeah you could say that but the yankees are much higher in wins. Any team in the top 5 you see in the playoffs every year though. It get's kinda old

	geowiz85:	Oct 18th, 2010 at 05:01 GMT		2 points
	for as much as people talk about the 'evil empire' that the yankees and red sox have and the imbalance of talent, i think its somewhat redeeming to think that even though the yankees and red sox made 5 world series in the last ten years, yet if the rangers pull the ALCS off, then the losing teams on the right will also combine for 5 world series appearances during that time

	pgrossma:	Oct 18th, 2010 at 12:45 GMT		3 points
	The Evil Empire comments are not just about success and records and world series appearances, they are also about how much more money the Yankees spend than everyone else. I put together a study recently looking at team salaries over the last ten years vs win totals and discovered that the yankees have spent a total of $1.78 Billion on player salaries alone over the past 10 years. That is $178 Million per year. The next closest team is Boston who spent $1.25 Billion. If you crunch the numbers on that the Yankees have spent 42% more money on player salaries than the Red Sox. The only two other teams over $1 Billion are the Mets (They certainly have squandered that money) and the Dodgers.

	commackfinest3:	Oct 19th, 2010 at 00:24 GMT		2 points
	how about them twins, always coming out of the blue into the playoffs! they have a small payroll but a high win total

	Dramathorn:	Oct 19th, 2010 at 00:26 GMT		-1 points
	all i did was start the time and type yankees for the first slot and thats all i need.

	greasytony:	Oct 21st, 2010 at 05:28 GMT		1 point
	The Twins great record comes mostly from beating up on the horrid division they're in. Granted, they've done wonders with a small payroll, but playing the usually dreadful Royals, Tigers, and Indians 18 times apiece every year will inflate any team's win total. (I know the Tigers and Indians made deep playoff runs recently, but those were more of a one year fluke than a consistently good team.)

	hsox05:	Oct 21st, 2010 at 11:17 GMT		2 points
	@greasytony: you seem to have forgotten just HOW bad the Devil Rays were. And Cleveland hasn't been THAT bad for the entire decade. They've had some horrible years, yes, but so has Toronto. And that's not even touching Baltimore. Records vs. their own division: Yankees-445-292, Twins 431-312, Red Sox 423-317. Yanks and Red Sox are right there with the Twins vs their own division. And a good bit of those losses can be attributed to BOS and NYY playing each other, right? So what does that say about the rest of the division? The last 2 years, what you said is probably true. Before that, I don't believe it to be true.

	hsox05:	Oct 21st, 2010 at 14:20 GMT		2 points
	Wish sporcle had an edit comments button- I should have said, i don't believe it to be true any more than the rest of the good teams.

	greasytony:	Oct 22nd, 2010 at 03:52 GMT		2 points
	@hsox: Toronto has been quite consistent in the 2000's. They had one horrible year in '04, but have been between 75 and 87 wins for the rest of the decade. And as bad as Tampa Bay was early in the decade, Detroit was even worse - near-record setting bad. (They have been better in recent years than I gave them credit for.) And yes, Cleveland has been mostly bad, too - below .500 in seven of the last nine years. Compare to Toronto, who has been over .500 five times in the decade - with two more seasons just under at 80 wins. I know Baltimore has pretty consistently sucked, but I still say that the A.L. Central competition is nowhere near the A.L. East - in 2008 and 2010 you could make the argument that the four best teams in the league were all in the East. I can't think of a year when the Central had even the two best teams in the league, let alone four.

	hsox05:	Oct 23rd, 2010 at 15:15 GMT		2 points
	"I can't think of a year when the Central had even the two best teams in the league, let alone four." 2006, arguably. ALCS was Detroit vs Oakland, but that Minnesota team was better than that Oakland team. Also, with the exception of the astoundly bad 2003 season, the Tigers weren't worse than the Rays. The Rays have had either the best or close to the best record in baseball in 2 of the last 3 seasons and they are still below the Tigers in decade record.

	pgrossma:	Sep 16th, 2011 at 17:07 GMT		1 point
	w00+, 3000 plays! That's exciting