Can you name the largest U.S. cities without a Major League Baseball franchise? by jml1139

City	Population (Rank)
	1,327,407 (7)
	1,197,816 (9)
	945,942 (10)
	821,784 (11)
	820,445 (12)
	790,390 (14)
	787,033 (15)
	741,206 (16)
	731,424 (17)
	649,121 (19)
	646,889 (20)
	601,222 (25)
	597,337 (27)
	583,776 (29)
	583,756 (30)

City	Population (Rank)
	579,999 (31)
	545,852 (32)
	520,116 (33)
	494,665 (34)
	466,488 (35)
	462,257 (36)
	439,041 (38)
	437,994 (39)
	416,427 (41)
	408,958 (42)
	403,892 (43)
	399,457 (44)
	391,906 (46)
	382,368 (49)

Javascript is not currently enabled on your browser.
If you do have Javascript enabled:
This site uses javascript to make the magic happen.
Please turn on javascript and reload this page, or use a more current browser (like Firefox)

Largest non-MLB U.S. cities Quiz

by jml1139

Created Jul 20, 2011 in Geography
Game Plays 475

Friend Scores and Standings

Loading friend results....

Top Games Today in Geography

Top Games with Similar Tags

Top User Games in Geography

	jeffthepardoner:	Jul 21st, 2011 at 00:00 GMT	4 points
	So we're really not giving Dallas/Fort Worth credit for the Rangers? The team plays in the metro area. I mean technically speaking, the Marlins don't play in Miami. The City of Miami has a population right at 400,000 so it would make the list too.

	chriskotx:	Jul 21st, 2011 at 00:09 GMT	4 points
	Yeah, saying that Fort Worth, Dallas, and Mesa dont have MLB baseball is silly - like saying NYC, Boston and Washington dont have NFL football. Change the quiz title to include the phrase 'city limits' and it will be correct.

	nspyred:	Jul 21st, 2011 at 00:52 GMT	3 points
	If you're going to put Fort Worth on the list at least accept Ft Worth.

	toledorockets:	Jul 21st, 2011 at 01:01 GMT	6 points
	interesting concept but i think it would be better if it were by market and not city

	sabresfan:	Jul 21st, 2011 at 01:54 GMT	-4 points
	Whoa, Pittsburgh has a baseball team?!?!?!?!? looks at standings At least for one season I guess...then they'll go back to being irrelevant.

	sedriskell:	Jul 21st, 2011 at 02:57 GMT	4 points
	You should really do this by metro. City population isn't really appropriate for this kinda thing.

	drewberry26:	Jul 21st, 2011 at 04:37 GMT	3 points
	professional teams don't go to the largest cities, they go to the largest metropolitan areas. That's why st. louis, even though it's city limits gives it less population than virginia beach, has a baseball team. It's metro area is very large.

	trivial:	Jul 21st, 2011 at 04:40 GMT	5 points
	Yeah, I guess by this logic Tampa doesn't have a team either since the Rays play in St. Pete.

	LinuxLinus:	Jul 21st, 2011 at 15:17 GMT	-2 points
	The quiz is exactly what it asks for. Being too dim to figure out the paramaters is your problem, not the quiz-maker's.

	redpegasus:	Jul 21st, 2011 at 18:26 GMT	1 point
	If you're going to be a stickler about city boarders, than that should be the point of the quiz (probably already been made, but anyway). It's kind of irritating to be naming the largest cities without a team and be putting in Dallas.

	jml1139:	Jul 23rd, 2011 at 23:50 GMT	1 point
	well, the whole idea of the quiz was to make quizzers think. and the quiz says, "largest u.s. cities without MLB franchises" ... not "largest u.s. metropolitan areas..." therefore, no, dallas and fort worth do not have MLB franchises. but, i'll appease the masses and do one with metro areas, as well.

	jeffthepardoner:	Jul 24th, 2011 at 05:17 GMT	1 point
	If you want to stick to city limits, then you need to add Miami, because the Marlins currently play in Miami Gardens.

	jml1139:	Jul 24th, 2011 at 19:15 GMT	0 points
	good point on miami.