| description | case name | ---- |
| Ordinace barring people from selling to the 'Negro or Mongolian race' | |
| Segregation in DC was challenged, is the federal gov't bound by the same constitutional principles as the state? | |
| States are bound by court's decision and cannot disobey them, brow n decision bound states to follow precendent | |
| White flight; interdistrict remedies required; lower courts ordered desegregation plan for all districts | |
| Can't assign students to schools based on race for racial equality | |
| 16/100 openings at UC Davis reserved for minority students | |
| Subcontract 30% of contracts to MBE | |
| U of MI used a point system to admit students to college | |
| Uses race as a factor for admission to U of MI law school | |
| Is gender a suspect class? | |
| Beer for females under 21, but not males! HELL ****ING YEAH. | |
| Virginia Military Institute challenged for its male only policy, created a parallel program for women | |
| Challenged apportionment of Alabama state legislature | |
| Is racial gerrymandering of the congression redistricting process a violation of the Equal Protection Clause | |
| Does the first amendment permits the Minnesota Supreme Court to prohibit candidates for judicial election in that State from announcing their views on disputed legal and political | |
| FEC limits on expenditures and contributions to political campaigns | |
| Ads banned before federal election | |
| Anti-corruption is not sufficient enough to displace speech | |
| No history-how to interpret? | |