Can you name the Prime Ministers of the United Kingdom?

Years	Prime Minister
1730-1742
1742-1743
1743-1754
1754-1756
1756-1757
1757-1762
1762-1763
1763-1765
1765-1766
1766-1768
1768-1770
1770-1782
1782-1783
1783
1783-1801
1801-1804
1804-1806
1806-1807
1807-1809
1809-1812
1812-1827
1827
1827-1828
1828-1830
1830-1834

Years	Prime Minister
1834
1834
1834-1835
1835-1841
1841-1846
1846-1852
1852
1852-1855
1855-1858
1858-1859
1859-1865
1865-1866
1866-1868
1868
1868-1874
1874-1880
1880-1885
1885-1886
1886
1886-1892
1892-1894
1894-1895
1895-1901
1902-1905
1905-1908

Years	Prime Minister
1908-1916
1916-1922
1922-1923
1923-1924
1924
1924-1929
1929-1935
1935-1937
1937-1940
1940-1945
1945-1951
1951-1955
1955-1957
1957-1963
1963-1964
1964-1970
1970-1974
1974-1976
1976-1979
1979-1990
1990-1997
1997-2007
2007-2010
2010-

Javascript is not currently enabled on your browser.
If you do have Javascript enabled:
This site uses javascript to make the magic happen.
Please turn on javascript and reload this page, or use a more current browser (like Firefox)

You might also like these games:
Prime Ministers of Canada	Monarchs of England	Prime Ministers of Australia

There are 116 comments for this game.
(Warning: comments may contain spoilers)

Prime Ministers of the UK Quiz

by Matt

Created Jan 2, 2008 in History
Featured Jan 2, 2008
Game Plays 179,862

Embed Game

Report a Mistake

Friend Scores and Standings

Loading friend results....

Top Games Today in History

Top Games with Similar Tags

Top User Games in History

	charlottetr:	Aug 30th, 2008 at 13:01 GMT		6 points
	titles rather than names!

Comment below threshold: show it

	PresidentJSC:	Oct 28th, 2008 at 11:32 GMT		2 points
	I am worried that Tony Blair is more obvious than WInston Churchill.

	jesus:	Nov 4th, 2008 at 16:56 GMT		11 points
	Or worse. Margaret Thatcher is more well known than Churchill. GULP.

	rockyraccoon88:	Nov 22nd, 2008 at 09:27 GMT		16 points
	Wellington was technically PM twice 1828-30 and 14th Nov 1834-10th Dec 1834

	Edu:	Nov 22nd, 2008 at 11:10 GMT		17 points
	why do we need the full name and the nickname for Pitt?? in most cases one surname is enough :(

	davebesag:	Dec 28th, 2008 at 23:41 GMT		5 points
	Yes, I was sure that was true about the Duke of Wellington

	Bookworm:	Jan 5th, 2009 at 12:55 GMT		5 points
	I can do the 20th century (although it took me several attempts to spell Alec Douglas-Home), but can get only a dozen or so before then. I hang my head in shame (and keep practicing).

	davidr:	Jan 11th, 2009 at 00:14 GMT		3 points
	@edu: Entering "younger" and "elder" suffices for the two Pitts. It's an artifact of the last name being enough: the software just thinks the last word is the last name.

	Ely:	Jan 14th, 2009 at 17:08 GMT		6 points
	I'm English - and I did waaaaaaaaaaay better at the presidents quiz - does anyone else feel British politics lacks something of the gusto of the USA? Especially with... Brown.

	K.M.:	Jan 16th, 2009 at 20:11 GMT		8 points
	I know Younger and Elder works for the Pitts, but that doesn't cross my mind. I think "Pitt the Elder" and "Pitt the Younger". Took me forever to recall their full names because it didn't even occur to me that elder and younger alone would suffice. I think it would be nice if "Pitt the Elder" and "Pitt the Younger" were also allowed.

	Bretzky:	Jan 25th, 2009 at 03:37 GMT		33 points
	This quiz reminds me of one of my favorite "Simpsons" scenes of all time. It's the episode where Mr. Burns puts together a softball team full of ringers. Wade Boggs can't play, though, because he gets punched out by Barney while they're arguing about who is Britain's greatest PM of all time. Barney says it's Lord Palmerston and Boggs says it's Pitt the Elder.

	Nuclear_Knuckles:	Jan 30th, 2009 at 05:34 GMT		6 points
	Haha Brett, I was just going to post that I only got Lord Palmerston because of the Simpsons. But I couldn't rememnber the other guy in the argument. Other than that, I only know the recent people and Churchill. I guess I've heard of Disraeli too but didn't think of him. Not too up on my British PMs.

	Nuclear_Knuckles:	Jan 30th, 2009 at 05:36 GMT		2 points
	Oh and I knew Chamberlain. There. Other than that I'm ignant.

	johnlk:	Feb 1st, 2009 at 16:15 GMT		8 points
	As pointed out before - It's "Earl of Shelburne" not "Shelbourne". Don't take Wikipedia's word for it, either - all other sources call him "Shelburne." "Shelbourne" appears to be the current spelling of the place in Dublin for which the earldom was named, but the guy himself is correctly called "Shelburne." And "Pitt" ought to be sufficient to get both Pitts. If "Grenville" gets you both Grenvilles, I don't see any argument for not doing the same with Pitt.

	gopaladins:	Mar 6th, 2009 at 19:48 GMT		8 points
	there's also a family guy episode where peter mentions benjamin disraeli...then it cuts to a proper-looking english man writing at a desk. he looks up to the camera and says, "you don't even know who i am!" hilarious.

	johnlk:	Mar 16th, 2009 at 20:18 GMT		5 points
	Lord John Russell and Earl Russell are the same man - typing in "Lord John Russell" should give me both.

	davidr:	Mar 16th, 2009 at 23:47 GMT		7 points
	@johnlk: True, though typing "Russell" gets you both with fewer keystrokes.

	davidr:	Mar 16th, 2009 at 23:51 GMT		18 points
	Also, the Whigs and Liberals appear to have been conflated.

	kupfernick:	Mar 19th, 2009 at 17:58 GMT		6 points
	Took this quiz because of all the brits on the presidents quiz. Couldn't remember Brown though, there's a personality. Every American should know North, Churchill, Blair, Thatcher and probably Lloyd-George and Chamberlin. Got Pitt the younger because of Black Adder III. Also Earl Grey? I'm going to remember that one from now on!

	onetheta:	May 14th, 2009 at 07:32 GMT		9 points
	"The Whigs and Liberals appear to have been conflated." Can I volunteer to conflate some politicians, or maybe inflate. As for Mrs T being better known than Churchill, well, why not? She certainly ruined more peoples lives more recently and she still commands a nauseating fan following.

	Walton:	May 27th, 2009 at 13:37 GMT		2 points
	missed shelbourne....I thought it was shelburne

Comment below threshold: show it

	HiddenPalace:	Jun 14th, 2009 at 05:18 GMT		9 points
	John Major is not going to be one of the better remembered prime ministers 100 years from now, lol

	Double_0_Spocle:	Jul 24th, 2009 at 21:31 GMT		4 points
	Ithink I did ok considering I'm 10!

	DeeJay:	Aug 3rd, 2009 at 17:59 GMT		3 points
	Shelbourne should be spelt Shelburne, and Marquis should be spelt Marquess.

Comment below threshold: show it

	Ricky Rouse:	Aug 21st, 2009 at 04:35 GMT		26 points
	From what I've read on here there are far more comments by people like lynzee moaning about British people complaining about US based quizzes than there are actual British people complaining about US based quizzes. Try and get rid of the massive chip on your shoulder lynzee (and people like you), and then take your own advice and just take the quizzes you want to take instead of arrogantly making your bitchy little point in a quiz where no-one up to that point had made a negative comment. I happen to enjoy US based history and geography quizzes like probably most Brits who come on here and get sick of being lectured by self-righteous idiots like you whenever I happen to read the comments.

Comment below threshold: show it

	davebesag:	Sep 13th, 2009 at 13:50 GMT		5 points
	@lynzee : You manage to take a lot of room on this page to say something that could be said in a line or two. The quiz itself now has the problem that Pitt the Younger works but not Pitt the Elder.

	Yodageddon:	Oct 11th, 2009 at 15:00 GMT		20 points
	How is it more worrying that Tony Blair - or Thatcher for that matter - is more obvious than Winston Churchill? Tony Blair was PM from 97-07. His time in office ended 2 years ago, and everyone who has played this game probably lived through his time. If people didn't know about him, they'd have to be absolutely clueless and live with their heads in a hole. While history is important - indeed, I'm a history student - it's not quite as important as having a basic grasp of the world around you.

	quiteinteresting:	Oct 11th, 2009 at 23:00 GMT		1 point
	Just to point out that officially the term "Prime Minister" was not used until Bannerman's term of office - prior to that they were all "First Lord of the Treasury" which is still true today (QI fans would know this anyway)- does this invalidate the answers before 1905?

	mat:	Oct 18th, 2009 at 11:55 GMT		4 points
	I think "Wellesley" should also be accepted for the Duke of Wellington.

	rockyraccoon88:	Nov 1st, 2009 at 21:45 GMT		2 points
	If Wellesley was accepted for the Duke of Wellington then the surnames of all the other Dukes, Earls and Marquises would also have to be accepted. While that wouldn't really be difficult almost all of them are better known by their title.

	Jawn:	Nov 20th, 2009 at 14:29 GMT		3 points
	@quiteinteresting. This quiz is a list of the Prime Ministers of the UK. Despite what you say is technically correct, the postition of First Lord of the Treasury was one which we would recognise as the same as Prime Minister. The first "de facto" Prime Minister was in 1721 - even QI recognises that.

	ministead:	Nov 29th, 2009 at 17:47 GMT		0 points
	actually QI is wrong, Asquith was officially the first prime minister, Although prime minister was used as a slang term in the media, walpole and other mp's considered it an insult. So this should be "can you name all the "First Lords of the Treasury"

	Jawn:	Dec 1st, 2009 at 21:45 GMT		6 points
	@ministead. If you're going to be pedantic about it then I will correct you in saying the first Prime Minister was actually Henry Campbell-Bannerman (who preceded Asquith). This quiz should not be "can you name all the 'First Lords of the Treasury'" as before Campbell-Bannerman not all of the First Lords of the Treasury are considered as the "Prime Minister" by us (e.g. Earl of Iddesleigh who was given the position by Salisbury). Furthermore, the position of First Lord of the Treasury came about in 1714 with Earl of Halifax taking the title - about 7 years before Walpole was considered Prime Minister (despite him holding the role before, in 1715), this quiz does not account for these and 3 other people who held the position before 1721. I agree this is a confusing topic and there are probably debates that we can go into as to when the prime minister role emerged, but for simplicity accepting the "de facto" list as shown here must be acceptable considering Walpole in 1721 and his predecessors were all regarded as "Prime Minister" despite the title not officially existing. Sorry for the essay.

Comment below threshold: show it