Can you name the leaders in the NHL in 08-09 (regular season)?

Javascript is not currently enabled on your browser.
If you do have Javascript enabled:
This site uses javascript to make the magic happen.
Please turn on javascript and reload this page, or use a more current browser (like Firefox)

NHL Leaders (2008-09) Quiz

Rating:	Report a mistake
Created by: Sam -
Published: June 15th, 2009
Category: Sports
Plays: 40,266

Tags: Hockey Quizzes, NHL Quizzes, category, season, stat, 08-09, regular, leader

Loading friend results....

	JohnJF:	Jun 15th, 2009 at 18:31 GMT	0 points
	"Hits" is an actual, official NHL stat? I guess you learn something new every day.

	mungar:	Jun 15th, 2009 at 18:45 GMT	8 points
	The answer for hits crushed the NHL record in a season by a whopping 45... and in his rookie year, no less!

Comment below threshold: show it

	Keonyn:	Jun 15th, 2009 at 19:09 GMT	2 points
	Man, I should know more of these than I do

	Morby:	Jun 15th, 2009 at 19:11 GMT	5 points
	As a Canadian I am ashamed by my results.

	fatbeard:	Jun 15th, 2009 at 19:22 GMT	2 points
	a bit embarassing how few i got considering the season just ended

Comment below threshold: show it

	HandleBarsJim:	Jun 15th, 2009 at 19:51 GMT	-1 points
	It doesn't accept Alexander Ovechkin.

	I_hate_pod_6:	Jun 15th, 2009 at 20:17 GMT	3 points
	11, not bad. Some of these were just way too hard though and this is coming from a hockey fan

	stlblues74:	Jun 15th, 2009 at 20:36 GMT	2 points
	15/16 the only one i missed was time on ice

	mennoknight:	Jun 15th, 2009 at 20:39 GMT	7 points
	The hits stat is incredibly biased and subjective; but Cal Clutterbuck might be the best name in hockey right now.

	GrooGruxKing:	Jun 15th, 2009 at 21:36 GMT	3 points
	As an avid hockey fan, I was disappointed I couldn't spell the +/- leader, but more importantly that I hadn't heard of the biggest hitter.

	fatbeard:	Jun 15th, 2009 at 22:01 GMT	2 points
	@mennoknight, Clutterbuck is indeed a great name, but Wojtek Wolski would also have to be considered for that

	ted:	Jun 15th, 2009 at 22:06 GMT	8 points
	Cal Clutterbuck is a legendary name. I also like Justin Abdelkader. And there's always the classic Miroslav Satan.

	Cheezdude:	Jun 15th, 2009 at 23:02 GMT	3 points
	Wow, even as a Calgary-ian, I didn't realize that Kiprusoff had held those two records. I didn't think he was as good as the last few years.

	bucknaked:	Jun 16th, 2009 at 00:01 GMT	3 points
	Got all the goalie ones, but only got 11/16. I missed all the ones in the middle from GWG to hits. Disappointed I didn't get either of those, especially game winners, I knew that one. Never would have gotten the PM leader, but I knew who he was. I think playing in a small market then being traded caused me to skip over him.

	Sal_Paradise:	Jun 16th, 2009 at 01:23 GMT	-4 points
	Who knows? I enter in my least favorite ex-Knick and get two answers. Additionally, can someone explain to me how a player got more penalty minutes than Sean Avery?

	Giants2082:	Jun 16th, 2009 at 05:10 GMT	0 points
	saw "penalty minutes" and laughed as I immediately typed Carcillo. GO FLYERS!

	fatbeard:	Jun 16th, 2009 at 07:38 GMT	3 points
	With the combination of growing talents with many major injuries this past season, it should be interesting to see how many of these names stay up there in the future years. For instance, would be suprised if Thomas ever leads again once Luongo, Brodeur and Dipietro are healthy again

	skudrafan1:	Jun 16th, 2009 at 12:39 GMT	5 points
	@Sal_Paradise: Sean Avery didn't play half the season, so that helps...

	DynamiteDG:	Jun 16th, 2009 at 14:30 GMT	2 points
	Sal, Avery was tied for 46th in the league in PIM with 111, and 25 of those minutes are from fighting, so there wasn't even a penalty kill. You're thinking of the general mentality that Avery is a goon and is consistently in the penalty box. He had a total of 86 penalty minutes outside of fighting. Not bad at all.

Comment below threshold: show it

	DrumBum88:	Jun 16th, 2009 at 15:42 GMT	4 points
	@Cheez: The reason for Kiprusoff leading in wins and saves is because he played like 70 of the 82 games. I'm sure if you take any goalie in the league and play him for 70 games he has a pretty good shot at leading those two stats.

	josh23:	Jun 16th, 2009 at 18:42 GMT	0 points
	@pbrown: why don't u stop being a bitter flyers fan and have fun knowing that crosby and malkin just won the cup... lets see the crappy flyers do that any time soon.

Comment below threshold: show it

	fatbeard:	Jun 17th, 2009 at 01:32 GMT	2 points
	@pbrown, actually, Maxime Talbot won a game. I'm pretty sure Malkin and Crosby might've had a few points in there. And that's just not true about them getting booed. I mean... who don't Flyers fans boo? Coming from a Devils fan, I mean, I'd rather not have seen the Pens win, but they deserved it

	josh23:	Jun 17th, 2009 at 21:44 GMT	2 points
	@pbrown: ya i agree with fatbread. also Your clearly just bitter because the penguins have knocked your Flyers out of the playoffs for the past few years. And ya what are you talking about? In what way did Talbot win them the cup. First of all he won them the one game, and if you think the only player who wins teams games is the guy who scores the goals then you clearly don't know hockey and are a waste of time to even argue with. And also if I'm not mistaken Pitsburg had to win another 15 games before they won in game seven and those ones are just as important. P.S. Can't wait to see the penguins knock the flyers out of the playoffs next year.

	pbrown:	Jun 19th, 2009 at 02:09 GMT	0 points
	Oh, I'm not doubting that the Penguins won the cup. Honestly, if I had to pick, it would have been the Penguins only because its always nice to see a new winner. They had a lot of hard work during the season, and they deserved it, even though they knocked the Flyers out. What bothers me is how Crosby and Malkin are the only players who ever get any fame or credit for a win, when there is people such as, Maxime Talbot, who had good games who get little to no credit. Going down a list, Fleury, Gonchar, Orpik, Kennedy, Fedotenko, just to name a few. All players on the Penguins had a role in winning the cup, not just Malkin and Crosby. Even the coach, the Penguins were like 5 points out of playoff contention when he stepped in, and look what happened in the end. Whether they knock the Flyers out again next year or not, well only time will tell. But my main argument is that all the players on the winning team don't get all the credit they deserve. P.S. its "fatBEARD" not "fatBREAD"

	josh23:	Jun 19th, 2009 at 04:07 GMT	2 points
	Okay well this point I agree with. It also really annoys me that Crosby and Malkin get all the attention when it is a total team effort. As annoying as it is though it happens with others teams as well, take Ovechkin and the Capitals or Kovalchuk and the Thrashers for example. And of course the Penguins coach deserves big credit, he no doubt turned the team around. I agree with this point that you made but your point about Talbot winning the Penguins the cup is still wrong.

	Rom:	Jun 21st, 2009 at 14:48 GMT	2 points
	As a Wild fan, I was reminded of Cal's record every game.

	BonesLover:	Jul 11th, 2009 at 14:59 GMT	1 point
	Can I state for the record that I am a HUGE penguins fan and am a little offended by the fact you think we're not a team based team (thats really oddly worded) and I agree with Josh23

	faber:	Aug 20th, 2009 at 00:41 GMT	0 points
	I kicked myself for missing Clutterbuck..until I realized I missed Jeff Carter...idiot

	willy1273:	Dec 18th, 2009 at 01:21 GMT	0 points
	if I could spell bouwmeester dammit

	OilFan:	Dec 21st, 2009 at 17:55 GMT	2 points
	Every team boos Crosby and Malkin? As an Oilers fan, I can tell you western Canadians get excited to see them play since they don't make the trip out here all that often.

	zsmith0014:	May 18th, 2011 at 01:29 GMT	1 point
	I wonder how Carcillo feels about the most penalty minutes