Can you name the Los Angeles Dodgers' retired numbers?

Javascript is not currently enabled on your browser.
If you do have Javascript enabled:
This site uses javascript to make the magic happen.
Please turn on javascript and reload this page, or use a more current browser (like Firefox)

You might also like these games:
MLB 3000 Hit Club	MLB 3000 Strikeouts	St. Louis Cardinals' Retired Numbers

There are 17 comments for this game.
(Warning: comments may contain spoilers)

L.A. Dodgers' Retired Numbers Quiz

by Ben

Created Nov 21, 2008 in Sports
Featured Nov 21, 2008
Game Plays 21,208

Embed Game

Report a Mistake

Friend Scores and Standings

Loading friend results....

Top Games Today in Sports

Top Games with Similar Tags

Top User Games in Sports

	hsox05:	Nov 21st, 2008 at 13:50 GMT		10 points
	Why is this quiz hidden? There is no picture or anything, I completely overlooked it at first.

	DirtyKash:	Nov 21st, 2008 at 14:54 GMT		1 point
	Because they're the Dodgers.

Comment below threshold: show it

	ku_sucks:	Nov 21st, 2008 at 20:23 GMT		7 points
	does anyone know why gil hodges hasn't had his number retired? he was a terrific player.

	drhaase:	Nov 23rd, 2008 at 16:25 GMT		5 points
	at Pat: his number is actually retired by the Mets.

	Camden:	Nov 24th, 2008 at 02:56 GMT		8 points
	Wow, No Maury Wills? He won an MVP with the Dodgers, I believe while they were in LA. So did Kirk Gibson. Where is he? No Don Newcombe? No Orel Hershiser? LA needs to get on the ball. My Royals have such low qualifications that they put you in the "Royals Hall of Fame" if you steal 12 bases in a season. Haha.

	drhaase:	Nov 27th, 2008 at 19:25 GMT		2 points
	how about a quiz for the Montreal Canadiens and New York Football Giants retired numbers. i know they both at least have 10

	Loppy:	Jan 11th, 2009 at 20:23 GMT		1 point
	Maury Wills should make this list, he was an awesome player

	Loppy:	Jan 17th, 2009 at 19:24 GMT		2 points
	Fernando Valenzuela isnt on this list either

	ku_sucks:	Mar 14th, 2009 at 19:00 GMT		2 points
	valenzuela isn't as deserving as don newcombe

	AKDforlife:	Mar 25th, 2009 at 04:47 GMT		1 point
	These numbers are beautiful to look at as they gleam over Chavez Ravine.

	uscbluedevil:	May 3rd, 2009 at 19:40 GMT		5 points
	Have to make the Hall of Fame to get your number retired by the Dodgers. (Gilliam being the only exception.) Thus, Wills, Hershiser, Gibson, Hodges, Newcombe, et al. are not going to be retired. (They probably would on almost any other team.) Valenzuela's #34 hasn't been worn by anyone since he left, so it's unofficially retired.

	challie:	Jun 23rd, 2010 at 08:04 GMT		1 point
	Is it just me, or is this list a little nonsensical? Doesn't overlap with Dodgers career leaders, MVPs, Cy Youngs or playoff heros at all.

	jquar440:	Aug 16th, 2010 at 09:33 GMT		1 point
	No Steve Garvey? Dodgers are weird.

	adamnvillani:	Sep 27th, 2010 at 18:21 GMT		1 point
	If we retired every great player, there wouldn't be enough left for anybody else to use. So they have to limit it somehow.

	Joker21:	Jan 1st, 2012 at 02:47 GMT		0 points
	Easy. I just looked online for Sutton and Gilliam.

	soxwin:	Sep 23rd, 2012 at 22:22 GMT		1 point
	It's amazing how the Dodgers haven't retired anyones number from the late 70's early 80's era. Seven of the ten players with retired numbers have Brooklyn ties which is nice that they honor the older stars but they should have at least one guy from the 81 WS.