Can you name the batsmen who have scored 300 or more in a Test innings?

Score	Batsman	Country/Year
400 n.o.		WI vs Eng, 2004
380		Aus vs Zim, 2003
375		WI vs Eng, 1994
374		SL vs SA, 2006
365 n.o.		WI vs Pak, 1958
364		Eng vs Aus, 1938
340		SL vs Ind, 1997
337		Pak vs WI, 1958
336 n.o.		Eng vs NZ, 1933
334 n.o.		Aus vs Pak, 1998
334		Aus vs Eng, 1930
333		Eng vs Ind, 1990

Score	Batsman	Country/Year
329		Pak vs NZ, 2002
329		Aus vs Ind, 2012
325		Eng vs WI, 1930
319		Ind vs SA, 2008
317		WI vs SA, 2005
313		Pak vs SL, 2009
311		Aus vs Eng, 1964
310		Eng vs NZ, 1965
309		Ind vs Pak, 2004
307		Aus vs Eng, 1966
304		Aus vs Eng, 1934
302		WI vs Eng, 1974
299 n.o.	WI vs Eng, 1974
299	WI vs Eng, 1974

Javascript is not currently enabled on your browser.
If you do have Javascript enabled:
This site uses javascript to make the magic happen.
Please turn on javascript and reload this page, or use a more current browser (like Firefox)

Test Cricket Triple-Centuries Quiz

Rating:	Report a mistake
Created by: davidr -
Published: February 6th, 2009
Category: Sports
Plays: 23,989

Tags: Cricket Quizzes, Country Quizzes, test, score, triple-century, batsmen, 300, inning, batsman

Loading friend results....

Comment below threshold: show it

	ronnymexico:	Feb 6th, 2009 at 04:45 GMT	3 points
	I don't know much about cricket, but the three names I could come up with got me 5/22. Don't think I could come up with another name if you gave me all day though, let alone another correct answer...

	quest:	Feb 6th, 2009 at 04:53 GMT	11 points
	good quiz... as an indian in america my cricket knowledge is kinda limited but it's nice to see cricket quizzes

Comment below threshold: show it

	GamesmasterG_9:	Feb 6th, 2009 at 06:53 GMT	3 points
	I got all the ones since I was born. Thank you for a change from moronic American sports quizzes (what the hell is a QB running yard anyway).

	davidr:	Feb 6th, 2009 at 09:20 GMT	5 points
	@Gamesmaster: A quick baker's running yard is three baker's feet, which is to say, 39 inches.

	Edge:	Feb 6th, 2009 at 10:09 GMT	2 points
	I opened this just to read the comments (I probably would have posted something like the first or second comment if they hadn't already). I was about to chide John Lambeth for his comment, but it seems none of us can play nice. How sad.

	GeordieGuitarist:	Feb 6th, 2009 at 10:12 GMT	6 points
	Good luck Americans.

	darth_shrimper:	Feb 6th, 2009 at 10:26 GMT	11 points
	Cracking. More cricket please! 17/22 for me

	davebesag:	Feb 6th, 2009 at 10:49 GMT	4 points
	Got 13 and couldn't spell Inzamam or Jayasuriya.

Comment below threshold: show it

	SW_London_Shrimp:	Feb 6th, 2009 at 12:28 GMT	8 points
	Some people just don't get irony, do they!!

Comment below threshold: show it

	Tuj:	Feb 6th, 2009 at 15:28 GMT	11 points
	Cricket and [American] football are both great for quizzes! I missed 3 - 307 must be the hardest answer.

	chris:	Feb 6th, 2009 at 17:15 GMT	5 points
	great quiz. now how about bowlers with over 300 test wickets?

Comment below threshold: show it

	peanut4:	Feb 6th, 2009 at 21:49 GMT	9 points
	Great quiz. Thanks Sporcle for giving us a mix of different sports. Keep it up.

	DandN:	Feb 6th, 2009 at 23:09 GMT	1 point
	Hah, outside of Bradman the only cricketers I knew came from the Slumdog Millionaire question. Obviously they were another position though :P

	Ryan:	Feb 7th, 2009 at 00:03 GMT	5 points
	this is what we need a mix of sports so us non-american users can have a chance. and if your aussie then all the aussie players should be easy enough to get bradman, hayden, cowper, simspon, taylor are all greats of australian sport

	Arthur:	Feb 7th, 2009 at 03:46 GMT	3 points
	Okay I don't know much about cricket but by guessing random last names I got Hanif Mohammad, Bob Simpson, Wally Hammond, and Mark Taylor.

	Derrie:	Feb 7th, 2009 at 15:09 GMT	4 points
	Excellent quiz. Let's have 100 more cricket quizzes (and rugby union and soccer) please.

	PresidentJSC:	Feb 7th, 2009 at 16:00 GMT	3 points
	Possibly accept "Hanif" for Hanif Mohammad, since there were four Mohammad brothers, and with Muslim names like Hanif, he was known as Hanif by the cricketing world anyway.

	illiterati:	Feb 8th, 2009 at 17:15 GMT	1 point
	I got 12/22 but i'm getting seriously sick of the hatred toward U.S. Centric quizzes. There is an equal supply of both types. If you want more euro-centric quizzes get off your arse and make one. specifically you gamemaster: calling it moronic on what basis? and same for anyone who bashes cricket if it's so horrid don't participate. gg

	Uhlan:	Feb 8th, 2009 at 20:58 GMT	1 point
	Surprised Tendulkar wasn't here.

	davidr:	Feb 9th, 2009 at 16:36 GMT	2 points
	@Ben: Yeah, that is a little surprising now you mention it. Tendulkar's highest score turns out to be 248 not out against Bangladesh in December 2004.

	MoldovaMovement:	Feb 24th, 2009 at 12:17 GMT	2 points
	Add Younus Khan to this list, he may even be at the top after tomorrows action.

	davidr:	Feb 24th, 2009 at 15:28 GMT	1 point
	@Andy: Will do, once his innings ends (currently 306 n.o. with a day left to play).

	davidr:	Feb 26th, 2009 at 08:39 GMT	1 point
	Ah well. He didn't get much further...

	Peter:	Mar 1st, 2009 at 23:46 GMT	-4 points
	sorry but is nobody else going to question the plural of batsman used above? or is it some kind of hilarious joke the point of which I am missing?

	StubbsyPVFC:	Mar 3rd, 2009 at 17:44 GMT	0 points
	I'm Attapatu or sangakkara aren't on this list can remember them getting a few double centurys.

	davidr:	Mar 13th, 2009 at 17:19 GMT	1 point
	@Peter: (`batsmans') I think you're just the first to have noticed! I've asked the admin mans to fix it.

	oldkent:	May 16th, 2009 at 00:54 GMT	6 points
	I like the crowe bonus answer

	Clamson:	Jun 17th, 2009 at 21:05 GMT	-2 points
	How things change... you seem to be missing Ramnaresh Sarwan.

	John2:	Jun 21st, 2009 at 07:03 GMT	2 points
	Possibly a 20/20 version of this game? Maybe not 300 but 90 or over? Could be good.

	breecey:	Jul 6th, 2009 at 14:46 GMT	3 points
	@Clamson: that might be something to do with Ramnaresh Sarwan's career best being 291 against England earlier this year.

	TheSwiss:	Aug 4th, 2009 at 20:42 GMT	1 point
	i got 16/23 , is not bad .............it will be very good if u make a same sort of quizz for double centuries also ............. loving sporcle...........great knowledge , great enjoyment

	Golden:	Dec 13th, 2009 at 21:47 GMT	2 points
	Can I suggest that 'Ul Haq' is permissable instead of the whole inzamam ul haq. It is on the other test cricket quiz (top run scorers) and I would have got it if I had not made a false assumption that ul haq would turn it up. Love the cricket quizzes btw - I might have to start trying to develop some.