LAND - Easements

Random Miscellaneous Quiz

Can you name the answers?

Quiz not verified by Sporcle

How to Play
Score 0/61 Timer 20:00
QuestionAnswer-----------Hint-------------
What is an easement?ius in alieno solo
What case sets out when a right is capable of being an easement?
Criteria from the above case: #1Essentially means there must be two identifiable pieces of land, one of which benefits from the exercis of the right
Case:
#2:Must be found to have some for of direct beneficial impact on the dominant tenement. Should be connected to the normal use & enjoyment of the land. A mere personal benefit is insufficient
What case is an example of a right not being an easement for failing this criteria?Where Cl ran a boat business. His lease from LA said 'sole & exclusive right'. D started up a new boat business on same canal. Court held right was for Cl's personal benefit only
Contrast this with which case?Where a right to signage (advert for a pub) was allowed as an easement because the business was so closely connected to the land
Dom & Serv land must be sufficiently proximate (Case):
#3:Easement is a right in alieno solo. Any right that a person may exercise over different parts of his own land is known as a quasi-easement
Case for quasi-easements:
#4:i.e. must be capable of forming the subject matter of a deed
The latter requirement has three additional requirements: #1:So two legal personalities. I.e. couldn't be 'the inhabitants of a village' etc.
#2:
Case:
In which case was the 'right to a view' held to be too imprecise?
#3:
Examples of things capable of becoming easements: Right of way:
Right of light:
Right of storage:
Apart from satisfying the Re Ellenborough criteria, what else must a potential new type of easement be?
Case:Former - Right to protection from the weather, latter - right to TV signal - both not granted
There are three additional criteria that would defeat the capability of a right becoming an easement: #1:
Case:Where the right to hot water was rejected for this reason
#2:
Case:Concerned the right to park a van. Claimant always moved the van when asked, therefore was seen as needing D's permission
#3:
What is the test for #3: Whether the owner
Case:
What is the next stage (if the rigth has suceeded in meeting all above requirements)?
This can happen in a number of ways, name them:
The first method can happen in one of two ways:
How will the court construe the latter?
Case:Where Cl reserved a right of way when selling development land. Claimed that he needed an extensive right of way but court said he should have reserved that at the beginning.
Implied acquisition: there are four key methods:
Necessity: Where it can be shown that the rights existence is…NB - Only really applies in landlocked land
For example if the property is landlocked. Which case failed as there was a means of access by water?
Easements will not be implied out of necessity simply because it would be advantageous to the dom ten (case):Where easements of drainage, sewerage and electricity were refused as the land could still be used in some way
Common intention: Of the parties, when?
Case:Lease, T promised to use premises as a restaurant, control smells & comply with H&S legs
Wheeldon v Burrows: Where a person sells/leases a piece of land the buyer will receive all…NB only applies in grant, not reservation
Three points to prove W v B: The right claimed must be: #1:
To be continuous the right in question need not have been subject to incessant use but there must be…
To be apparent the right must have been discoverable/detectable from…
Case:
Case where a right hadn't been used for 11 months but that didn't matter:
#2:
Compare this case where it was not necessary:There were two possible, equally convenient, entrances. Only one was deemed necessary
With this case where it was:Where Cl was a poultry farmer and needed alternative access for heavy vehicles. This was deemed necessary
#3:
Must be in use by the owner, i.e. seller/leaser (case):
S62 LPA 1925: The normal function of this section is that, if you buy a plot of land and there is an easement already…A word saving provision for conveyancing. Can be excluded
However there is also another function whereby…NB a license can be revoked at will & is not proprietary
What is a good case example?landlord grants lease to T, L gives T permission to store coal in the shed on L’s retained land. Permission turns into a legal easement on grant of new lease or sale of freehold reversion to T or 3rd Party
What does a s62 require?
Case:
However there is an exception from which case:D owned hotel + land next to it (w/boat moorings). Sold hotel to Cl but didn't sell other plot w/moorings. Cl claimed that mooring was continuous + apparent. CA said yes.
Where the right is…(i.e. Wheeldon v Burrows w/out #2 (necessary for reasonable enjoyment). In a Q, use W v B first then consider P v C exception to s62.
What kind of situation is a landlord/tenant situation with prior diversity?Traditional application of s62
What kind of situation is one with prior common ownership?Then consider Platt v Crouch
Does S62 apply to reservations and contracts?Only deeds - NB must still satisfy Ellenborough Park, particularly a problem where continual permission is needed (Green v Ashco)
Prescription: Where easements can be acquired where they have exercised the right for at least…Therefore presumed acquiscence by the servient owner. (NB no force, secrecy or permission)

Friend Scores


  Player Best Score Plays Last Played
You You haven't played this game yet.

You Might Also Like...

Extras

Created Feb 3, 2012ReportNominate
Tags:law