Can you name the Worst Value For Money QBs (09-10)? by elpamplona

Can you name the Worst Value For Money QBs (09-10)?

created by elpamplona

Enter an answer (last names acceptable) in the box below
Correctly named answers will show up below
Click any empty Team or Player to answer for that location
Source: Link
Top 10 Worst value for money QB's based on total salary (including bonuses) per TD pass in 2009-10 (no more recent data available). Minimum 8 TD passes. Check out opposite game.
This quiz has not been verified by Sporcle

Popular trivia games today

Images that Start with 'H'

24454

Top Grossing Movies Per Sport

14819

Countries With Two-Colored Flags

11351

Countries of the World (Redux)

10734

Premier League Hat-Trick Minefield

9611

Word Ladder: Magazines

8581

Candy Wrappers Close-Up

7844

Missing Word: NBC Shows (1960s)

6328

And more...

02:00

Show Missed Answers

Team	Player	$ Per TD Pass
Kansas City Chiefs		937825
San Diego Chargers		912737
Chicago Bears		816448
Carolina Panthers		790625
New York Giants		759259
Arizona Cardinals		730949
Houston Texans		586207
Philadelphia Eagles		568513
Jacksonville Jaguars		566667
Cincinnati Bengals		452381

Javascript is not currently enabled on your browser.
If you do have Javascript enabled:
This site uses javascript to make the magic happen.
Please turn on javascript and reload this page, or use a more current browser (like Firefox)

Worst Value For Money QBs (09-10) Quiz

by elpamplona

Created Feb 13, 2011 in Sports
Game Plays 157

Friend Scores and Standings

Loading friend results....

Top Games Today in Sports

Top Games with Similar Tags

Top User Games in Sports

	elpamplona:	Feb 13th, 2011 at 16:47 GMT	1 point
	Almost a million per TD pass......jesus.

	JBZs:	Feb 13th, 2011 at 18:09 GMT	1 point
	Rivers made less money than Palmer, yet threw seven more touchdown passes. How could your math possibly work out?

	elpamplona:	Feb 13th, 2011 at 18:16 GMT	1 point
	Hi, according to the source (and assuming it is correct - USA Today), Rivers made over $25.5m that year, though most of it was in signing bonus. Palmer made $9.5m, all in salary. I'll amend the intro to specify that the amount includes bonuses, not just salary.

	jumbodung:	Feb 13th, 2011 at 18:18 GMT	1 point
	Wow, stats and numbers can be manipulated to show anything!

	sbshuffler85:	Feb 13th, 2011 at 19:01 GMT	1 point
	I think the garrard number is incorrect

	hyeh81:	Feb 13th, 2011 at 19:06 GMT	1 point
	@jumbodung. Not really. It just shows the craziness of NFL contracts. In all sports, there are long-term deals that are top-heavy, meaning more of the money is paid in the beginning and middle years and less at the end. But in football, it's more of a top-obese contract. A huge amount is paid in the first year or two and it decreases dramatically afterwards.

	hyeh81:	Feb 13th, 2011 at 19:07 GMT	1 point
	The aforementioned signing bonus is part of the NFL's contract structure. That's why Rivers is on this list.

	elpamplona:	Feb 14th, 2011 at 21:02 GMT	1 point
	Sorry, have amended Garrard - had an extra 6 there, made it look like over $5.6m per TD pass. And he's David Garrard, not JaMarcus Russell.