Can you name the Property 2 Cases?

created by bunnahabhain
  • Enter an answer in the box below
  • Correctly named answers will show up below
  • Click any empty Ratio or to answer for that location
  • Revision aid for Property Law 2 at LLB Ordinary level.
  • This quiz has not been verified by Sporcle
20:00
Show Missed Answers  
Ratio
There is an obligation to refrain from interfering with non-tidal waters and their natural flow
Cycling is an accessory to the right to walk. Driving is not and extension of cycling
Burdens of pre-emption must be construed strictly
Overhanging branches could be an encroachment
A servitude can be created by acquiescence - in this case, watching them lay a pipelin
Waters around the Shetlands are not Udal - way
Hanging a sign is not a servitude recognised by law
To create a right of access, acquiescence gives rise to positive prescription. The threshold in an urban area is higher than in the county
The best evidence of future trespass is previous tresspass
A change in the use of the benefited property is not necessarily an increase in burden
Encroachment is a delict, and there is no defence that it is trivial
To impliedly grant a servitude there must be a quasi servitude at the time of severance
At Common Law there is permission to remove a trespasser with as much force as is reasonably necessary
The selling of ice creams and refreshments is not 'recreation' when it comes to the foreshore
In a case of encroachment, acquiescence creates consent
A servitude does not extend to neighbouring land coincidentally owned by the benefited proprietor
Damages may be available for an encroachment which is not readily removable. The damages must be quantifiable
In passage servitudes, a change in the thing passing through is an increase in burden
A burdened owner can still use his property, but must respect the servitude
Closing a water pipe was successfully argued to be aemulatio vicini
Maintained that the test of a reasonable person under the LRSA is an objective one, and the court shouldn't account for the person's own situation
It is not possible to interdict animals for trespass, unless the animal is of a type easily contained
Aemulatio Vicini - 16 foot wall did not count
Painting above a building is not a servitude
A servitude of overhang was recognised
Ratio
In cases of nuisance, damages are only available in the instance of fault
Authorised users of the benefited property may use the servitude
When applying rules of scheme majority, you look at the ownership situation at that point in time
Any member of the public, or the Crown, may enforce public rights to navigate waters
Landlocked land servitude cannot negatively prescribe. Rather, this is an inherent right of ownership
A servitude of parking is competent
A deed creating a real burden must contain its terms within the four corners of the deed
Not essential to use the word 'servitude' to create one
Acts ancillary to navigating tidal waters are permitted. Laying moorings is not an ancillary right
Consent for an encroachment may transmit to a successive owner, provided they got notice or constructive notice of the encroachment
When altering common interest, alterations are permitted up until they are measurable and not merely negligible
Liability for damages in trespass is not strict
Where there is a common interest obligation, one party can carry out maintenance and recover the cost from the other party/parties
Whether increased use is an increase in burden is to be assessed case by case
It was okay for a landowner to create a barrier to stop horses getting onto his footpath - horses would have damaged the path
Servitude is only implied in the event of utter necessity
The test under s6(1)(b)(iv) of the LRSA is what the reasonable person in a property of that type would require, but in exceptional circumstances, an exception could be made
Attaching a flue was an encroachment, but was permitted out of necessity. It was essential and there was nowhere else to put it
When support/shelter fails, then damages are only available to the damaged property in the instance of culpa
A servitude is impliedly granted if it is necessary for the reasonable enjoyment of the property
Servitudes must confer a praedial benefit
The greater the use made of a servitude, the less likely that this was merely 'tolerance'
No need for detailed content of the servitude
Separate tenements are generally allowed below ground under the conventional rules, but not generally permitted above ground.
In practice, an additional piece of land as a pertinent needs to be fortified by right by positive prescription
You might also like these games:
Famous Foursomes   Fast Food Restaurants   Product Mascots
There are no comments yet for this game.
Click here to be the first!

Scots Property Law (2) Cases Quiz

  1. by bunnahabhain

Friend Scores and Standings

Loading friend results....