Scots Property Law (1) Cases

Random Miscellaneous Quiz

Can you name the Property 1 Cases?

Quiz not verified by Sporcle

How to Play
Obligation to convey ownership does not prescribe for 20 years
Trout bought on a fish farm lost their status as fera naturae, so even when they escape, they were still the owner's property
Signature and witnessing must be one continuous process
Elaboration on s12(1)(d) in the LRSA 1979
Abandoned property belongs to the crown
An a non domino disposition cannot be from A to A
Although division and sale usually takes place on the open market, one co-owner can have the right to buy out the share of another co-owner at market value
Illegible signatures possibly valid, never probative
If the purpose of attachment is for the better use of the property, there is functional subordination
Where a heavy object rests on its own weight, there is sufficient physical attachment for accession
To decide if division is impossible, you have to look at the practicalities of doing so. Otherwise, you sale and divide up the proftits
Industrial growing crops do not accede to the land which they grow on
One Common owner of fishing rights could not grant a 3rd party 'exclusive fishing rights' without consent of all other common owners
An acknowledged letter was suitable for the purposes of intimation
By recording a security without checking the position of known prior rights, the party is facilitating a breach, so offside goals apply
All sums clauses are legitimate in Scotland
Salmon growing from smolts is not specification
It is okay to subdivide your share of Common Property
Servitudes will generally be material regarding warandice
For prescription, an ambiguous conveyance favours the buyer
Assignation is not to worsen the position of the debtor
Unless there is irrevocable attachment for accession, it is necessary to consider the other two elements of the test
Warrandice is assigned all the way back through a chain of dispositions (retrocession)
Default rule of common property is that the consent of all is required
To grant a servitude over Common property, all owners must participate
A buyer in possession under SOGA s25 can transfer good title, which defeats retention of title clauses
Each co-owner is entitled to physical division, or if impossible, to division and sale
If the new item is of a different species from the old, specification has occurred. It is more likely to have occurred where there is little possibility of reversing the process
Elaboration on 'Proprietor in Possession'
Affirmation of the container case in Scotland
For rectification in the register, there had to be an act or omission on the claimant's part which caused the loss
Sporadic dumping and peat cutting not enough for possession (in prescription)
Parties' intentions are irrelevant to accession
Tapestries affixed to walls did not accede to the property as they could be easily removed (English case)
Voidable title transferred to buyer in good faith becomes valid
Rule of first completion
The curtain principle
The option to do something is not the same as a direct obligation to make a grant
If extraordinary use of common property has become common over time, it may be permitted
A deed cannot prescribe positively if it is intrinsically null
Two common owners cannot grant a 'lease' to one of the owners. This is a matter for contract
Repairs may be carried out on Common property and costs recovered pro rata
If the assignor's right could be extinguished by compensation, the assignee's could too
An unknown tenant was deemed immaterial for warrandice. This is probably wrong now
Compensation is available when the owner of the accessory has their property accede to the principal when they mistakenly believed they had a right to the principal
Black and white divide between personal and real rights
There is no specification where the original property was obtained in bad faith
Only quasi-permanency is required for accession. Those with lease can remove acceded property during their lease
Trees planted along a boundary are common property, so changing them needs the consent of 2 parties
Warrandice includes constructive knowledge of what may burden the property
When a co-owner illegally took up exclusive use of Common property, it was held that no damages were available. Andrew Steven believes this to now be wrong
Judicial eviction is required before a claim arises in breach of warrandice, although exceptionally you can apply when the granter is on the brink of insolvency
The right to buy out a co-owner at market value is only available if one party does not contest the action
Offside goals rule
Containers: possessing item in a container requires intention to possess everything in that container
A work of art which filled a space formerly occupied by panelling could accede to the heritable property
For land, risk passes on conclusion of contract
Mutual special adaptation is a sign of permanency in accession
Only ordinary use of common property is permitted
Common owners have right to make use of property. No owner to take excessive benefit

You're not logged in!

Compare scores with friends on all Sporcle quizzes.
Sign Up with Email
Log In

You Might Also Like...

Show Comments