| Holding | Case name |
| Discrimination cases | |
| Current law in dormant commerce clause is no discrimination | |
| Congress cannot change what the constitution gives | |
| Has to be an economic activity for congress to regulate it in interstate commerce | |
| Removed the manufacturing distinction | |
| A president's official acts while sitting are always immune | |
| Delegation doctrine have to have legislative purpose and guidelines | |
| States have to listen to the holdings of SCOTUS | |
| Limitations on the spending power | |
| Political question six factor test | |
| Any legislative action has to go through presentment and bicameralism | |
| If the task is not within the original power of the states they do not have it now | |
| If congress appoints then officered can only do legislative activities | |
| Cannot tell a state executive branch how to enforce state laws | |
| Separation of powers big case with jackson's concurrence | |
| An example of category 1 of presidential power - action has happened over a long time so consent | |
| If contest enemy status and American citizen the at least entitled to a neutral judge | |
| An interpretation of the constitution carries the weight of the constitution | |
| Necessary and proper clause is the convenient useful and proper clause | |
| Dormant commerce clause exception 3 | |
| Home processing example | |
| Now it comes down to whether the activity places a substantial economic effect on interstate commerce | |
| If the act was not within official acts then no immunity | |
| Hamilton said power to tax must be used to provide for the general welfare of the state | |
| Regulating medicinal weed is economic activity | |
| Can regulate states in the same way as regulate private | |
| Federal courts have no jurisdiction over enemy aliens held outside the USA | |
| An interpretation of the equal protections clause is not a political question | |