Can you name the decades in which two or fewer men served as US President (1780s-Present)? by ShepherdBook

Occurance	Decade (All Four Digits Required)	Presidents
1		1 (Washington)
2		2 (Washington, Adams)
3		2 (Madison, Monroe)
4		2 (Jackson, Van Buren)
5		2 (Grant, Hayes)
6		2 (Taft, Wilson)
7		2 (Hoover, Roosevelt)
8		2 (Roosevelt, Truman)
9		2 (Truman, Eisenhower)
10		2 (Bush, Clinton)
11		1 (Obama)

Javascript is not currently enabled on your browser.
If you do have Javascript enabled:
This site uses javascript to make the magic happen.
Please turn on javascript and reload this page, or use a more current browser (like Firefox)

You might also like these games:
Pre-Presidents	Shortest US Presidencies	Four Word Movie Reviews

There are 7 comments for this game.
(Warning: comments may contain spoilers)

Two or Fewer Presidents in a Decade Quiz

by ShepherdBook

Created Nov 3, 2009 in History
Game Plays 908

Friend Scores and Standings

Loading friend results....

Top Games Today in History

Top Games with Similar Tags

Top User Games in History

	trivial:	Nov 3rd, 2009 at 19:13 GMT		8 points
	I think this is a good idea, but it's too easy as is. It would probably be better if you gave us the decade and we had to give the Presidents for that decade instead.

	TimeAndTide:	Nov 3rd, 2009 at 22:09 GMT		0 points
	I disagree with trivial. I think both ways would be comparably easy. Nothing wrong with it being easy; the 1-minute time limit is what gives the challenge. Forgive me for the following picky grammar comment: It should be "two or fewer men", not "two or less". It's a subtle distinction, but one that always stands out for me. Good quiz, though. I enjoyed it!

	davebesag:	Nov 3rd, 2009 at 23:05 GMT		8 points
	The problem is that you can pretty much type in every decade in 1 minute.

	cocky:	Feb 13th, 2010 at 20:20 GMT		-2 points
	I guess you could add the 2010s now.

	DonnyB:	Feb 25th, 2010 at 23:38 GMT		1 point
	I would randomize the order of the answers

	FreakyFlyBry:	Jul 8th, 2010 at 05:29 GMT		3 points
	Too soon to include the 2010's, I think. Best to wait until the decade's over, we could have more than 2 presidents.

	Namida:	Jul 8th, 2010 at 13:00 GMT		3 points
	Agree with FreakFlyBry. Including the 2010s at this point is kind of silly.