Can you name the elements from the computer game 'Civilization V'?

Javascript is not currently enabled on your browser.
If you do have Javascript enabled:
This site uses javascript to make the magic happen.
Please turn on javascript and reload this page, or use a more current browser (like Firefox)

Civilization V Quiz

by Noobleton

Created Sep 10, 2011 in Gaming
Featured Feb 23, 2012
Game Plays 2,739

Report a Mistake

Friend Scores and Standings

Loading friend results....

Top Games Today in Gaming

Top Games with Similar Tags

Top User Games in Gaming

Archived comments: show them

	Rayavi:	Feb 23rd, 2012 at 18:50 GMT	1 point
	Either Sid Meier misspelled Gandhi or you did.

	MrRoboto:	Feb 23rd, 2012 at 19:12 GMT	4 points
	I am of the opinion that, for the scope of this quiz, Nebuchadnezzar should be sufficient without the "II". Just strikes me as overly-restrictive (and bummed me out just as I was getting ready to high-five myself for spelling the name)

	tulliuscicero:	Feb 23rd, 2012 at 20:39 GMT	4 points
	Maybe just accept 'Nobunaga?'

	Rattelsnake:	Feb 24th, 2012 at 01:51 GMT	2 points
	Forget Sejong... First answer: KAAAAAAA MEEEEEEEEEE HAAAAAAAAAAA MEEEEEE HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

	SecretMike:	Feb 24th, 2012 at 02:28 GMT	6 points
	How about just Augustus for Augustus Caesar?

	Jordan117:	Feb 24th, 2012 at 06:23 GMT	5 points
	If you haven't played Civ 5, be sure to check out some videos of the diplomacy screens with foreign leaders on YouTube, they're amazing. Full, expressive 3D renders of each great figure in a paragon of their culture (Augustus ruminating on a marble throne, Khan riding horseback on the windy steppes, Montezuma in the glow of a burning sacrifice, etc.). They even speak their own languages! It's great if you're a history buff; here's a good video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h7HZlzSQYY0

	Mirrorboy:	Feb 24th, 2012 at 12:47 GMT	5 points
	I like the way Gandhi rules India, but still declares war on you...

	TJL:	Feb 24th, 2012 at 16:52 GMT	1 point
	All right, putting this question out to Sporcle, since I haven't played it yet: how does it compare to Civ IV? Also, they have some strange leader choices and did away with multiple leader choices per civilization?

	gmish504:	Feb 24th, 2012 at 20:26 GMT	2 points
	Too bad my computer couldn't handle this game. It's alright though Civ IV could ever get old.

	tulliuscicero:	Feb 24th, 2012 at 22:35 GMT	2 points
	@TJL: I was disappointed because of the leader/civ choices and the elimination of leader characteristics, but that's only because Louis XIV was tailor-made for my strategy. I find it's a lot more accessible for inexperienced players, and the combat is definitely more interesting, although it's not better or worse.

	SecretMike:	Mar 25th, 2012 at 06:18 GMT	1 point
	@Mirrorboy: There's a joke coded into Gandhi's AI -- he focuses on building nuclear weapons more than any other leader in the game. @TJL: You'll either think it's an oversimplification or a distillation of what makes Civ games work. I tend to think it's the latter. There's no more religion (though the expansion is adding it back in), no giant death stacks, and there's a clear downside for sprawling empires. I'd like them to bring back multiple leaders for each faction, but I think they did a good job at making every civilization have very distinct strengths.

	firething11:	Apr 2nd, 2012 at 16:35 GMT	2 points
	Perhaps accept just 'America' for the USA, because that's what it's refered to as ingame.