| What It's About | Court Case |
| 1833: In a 7-0 decision concerning Rights Under the Constitution, Justice Marshall leads the court in finding that the Bill of Rights applies only to the federal government. | |
| 1937: In an 8-1 decision, Cardozo finds that 'implicit in the concept of ordered liberty' are fundamental rights that apply both to states and the fed. gov't. Introduces concept of | |
| 1866: Davis leads the court in finding that the Constitution can never be suspended. Emergency, war powers are a lie. | |
| 1944: Black leads the court in ruling that the Constitution allows for war powers. (6-3 decision) | |
| 1905: The court finds that individual liberty must sometimes be subject to the common welfare. Legitimate use of police power. | |
| 1905: Peckham leads the court in finding that the liberty of contract is a significant human liberty and calls for intermediate scrutiny regarding laws against it. | |
| 1923: The court holds that the liberty to teach and engage a teacher is part of the Constitution, and that 'mere knowledge of the German language' is not harmful. | |
| 1937: Hughes leads the court in holding that the Con. does not speak of liberty of contract and liberties aren't absolute. Something done in public interest largely satifies 'due p | |
| 1955: Douglas greatly defers to legislature. Laws don't have to be logical in every respect. Rational basis = due process. People must resort to polls... | |
| 1938: Footnote 4 establishes that stricter scrutiny may be used when a law looks like it violates a specific Con. provision or affects relious, 'discrete and insular' minorities. | |
| 1954: The court concludes that, if a statute serves a public purpose, it satisfies the public use requirement of takings clause. Huge deference to legislature. | |
| 1984: Rational basis is used in the loosest sense, with great deference to legislature, to justify the actions of Hawaii's gov't. Confirms Berman v. Parker. | |
| 2005: Stevens confirms Berman v. Parker, that public purpose is as good as public use. | |
| 1992: The court confirms the precedent that 'just compensation' does not have to be given for takings for 'harmful and noxious' uses. | |
| 1987: Scalia returns to intermediate scrutiny to find a law to be an illegitimate takings. | |
| 1919: Holmes introduces the 'Clear and Present Danger' test for speech cases. It is a 'question of proximity and degree.' | |