mentally stimulating diversions
Random Quiz
Random Sports
Home
Games
Create
User Created
Go
Most Popular
Newest
By Rating
By Length
By Favorites
By Difficulty
By Tags
Geography
Entertainment
Science
History
Literature
Sports
Language
Just For Fun
Religion
Movies
Television
Music
Gaming
Miscellaneous
Holiday
Can you name the Big Four sports teams not named after solid objects?
created by
JayHankEdLyon
Enter a team in the box below
Correctly named teams will show up below
Answers do not have to be guessed in order
This quiz has not been verified by Sporcle
Popular trivia games today
Candy Wrappers Close-Up
5882
Same Letter Country/Capitals
3683
Click or Be Killed!!!
2023
Multiple Eurovision Winners
2002
Countries of the World (Redux)
1866
Word Ladder: Horse Gaits
1751
Word Laddyrinth XIII
1225
Premier League Hat-Trick Minefield
1155
And
more...
PLAY GAME
Enter team:
0
/18 teams correct
03:00
Show Missed Answers
NBA
NHL
MLB
Javascript is not currently enabled on your browser.
If you do have Javascript enabled:
HIDE THIS WARNING
This site uses javascript to make the magic happen.
Please turn on javascript and reload this page, or use a more current browser (like
Firefox
)
You might also like these games:
MLB Teams
NBA Teams
4-Sport Cities
Loading...
There are
16 comments
for this game.
(Warning: comments may contain spoilers)
Non-Solid Big Four Teams Quiz
by
JayHankEdLyon
Created Feb 4, 2011 in
Sports
Game Plays 238
Nominate
Report Game
Tags
big
Big Four
object
solid
name
non-solid
team
four
JayHankEdLyon
:
Feb 4th, 2011 at 14:20 GMT
2 points
Comments about what should and shouldn't be included are welcome; some names, like the Cardinals, began as colors but came to mean physical objects, so they're out. Others, like the Browns and Bills, are named after people and are thus considered solid objects. But anything is up for debate; adjectival teams are difficult to classify!
awix
:
Feb 4th, 2011 at 14:29 GMT
1 point
I liked it. Maybe angels as an answer? or at least a bonus. I don't know many angels that are "solid", but I am just nitpicking. I could see it both ways.
hollabackitsobi
:
Feb 4th, 2011 at 14:44 GMT
3 points
The Phillies aren't a solid object, but Angels are? Phillies = slang for people in Philadelphia, right?
JayHankEdLyon
:
Feb 4th, 2011 at 14:59 GMT
1 point
The question is whether Philly short for 'Philadelphia' (which isn't a solid object but a whole city) or 'Philadelphian' (or a person) in this context. According to the source I used for my sports etymology stuff it's the city, not the people, but if enough people agree with you via comments or upvotes I'll gladly make it a bonus instead.
Etheridge2
:
Feb 4th, 2011 at 15:26 GMT
2 points
This is a nice idea, but there are too many iffy ones, I mean what is a National? Phillies can go either way, the elemental team s (Heat, Thunder, Lightning, Flames, etc) are easy, but the others I don't know..nice idea, but not my favorite and you make some outstanding quizzes so don't be offended.
mrormiston
:
Feb 4th, 2011 at 15:34 GMT
2 points
Tampa bay rays. When they went from the devil rays to just the rays, it changed from being a sting ray to a ray of sunshine.
JayHankEdLyon
:
Feb 4th, 2011 at 15:42 GMT
1 point
I'll make Rays a bonus, as they still have semblances of manta rays on their uniforms and such. As for the Nationals, a National is quite simply a person from a nation. In any case, no offense taken, I literally thought of this quiz on the way to class and wrote it up during, hardly a labor of love over here.
BlueOx
:
Feb 4th, 2011 at 16:17 GMT
2 points
I'm not sure I follow why Phillies are not solid, but 76er's are. And Lakers originally referred to the lakes of Minneapolis.
JayHankEdLyon
:
Feb 4th, 2011 at 16:42 GMT
2 points
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/laker. Meanwhile, 76er is an oversight on my part (lumped it with 49ers, which is a term for prospectors.)
sbshuffler85
:
Feb 4th, 2011 at 16:59 GMT
-1 points
aren't the suns a solid object?
potatoesandpants
:
Feb 4th, 2011 at 17:56 GMT
-2 points
the sun (as well as a star)is a pretty solid object
JayHankEdLyon
:
Feb 4th, 2011 at 18:01 GMT
2 points
Stars are plasma, not solid. The dreaded fourth state of matter.
BlueOx
:
Feb 6th, 2011 at 05:02 GMT
3 points
Trust me, the term "laker" has nothing to do with fish or cargo vessels. Minneapolis is the City of Lakes, located in the Land of 10,000 Lakes. Even in Minnesota, water is not a solid - well, at least not all of the time...
JayHankEdLyon
:
Feb 6th, 2011 at 16:46 GMT
-1 points
The dictionary says otherwise. I'm fully aware of the history of the Lakers in relation to Minnesota, but regardless of what your opinion is on the matter it's a fact that a laker is a solid object.
fordefr
:
Mar 11th, 2011 at 18:54 GMT
2 points
List a source please. I disagree with the lakers not being here. Lakers are named after the lakes. If you are basing other ones off the etymology (like phillies) then you should have the lakers on here. Even though the word lakers might mean something else, it was named after the lakes.
LeoDaVinci
:
Sep 21st, 2011 at 21:12 GMT
1 point
If this is 'Big 4' then the 49ers deserve a mention if the 76ers get one. Stars and the sun are usually plasma, but can also be degenerate matter, therefore a solid. The phrase "like a diamond in the sky" is more accurate than you might think, as carbon is often one fo the last stages of the matter in a star.
2007-12 © Sporcle, Inc. -
About
 |
Advertise
 |
Feedback
 |
Blog
 |
FAQ
 |
Embed
 |
News
 |
Terms
 |
Jobs
 |
Privacy
 
Part of USA Today Sports Media Group
Go to the Sporcle.com Mobile Site →