Can you name the Diamonds in the Rough (Red Wings)? by Hockeymaster

Can you name the Diamonds in the Rough (Red Wings)?

created by Hockeymaster

Enter an answer (last names acceptable) in the box below
Correctly named answers will show up below
Answers do not have to be guessed in order
Late round (After first round) draft picks that became dependable NHLers for the Wings (And you were wondering why they have dominated the NHL for the past two decades)
This quiz has not been verified by Sporcle

Popular trivia games today

Candy Wrappers Close-Up

4438

Same Letter Country/Capitals

2121

Click or Be Killed!!!

1196

Word Ladder: Horse Gaits

1166

Countries of the World (Redux)

1091

Multiple Eurovision Winners

939

Word Laddyrinth XIII

861

Missing Word: Television Movies

762

And more...

10:00

Show Missed Answers

Draft Year/Number	Player	Games Played
1983/46		935
1983/86		573
1985/113		932
1986/22		1152
1989/53		1176+
1989/74		1128
1989/116		944
1989/221		446
1990/45		1182
1991/54		621+
1991/76		889+

Draft Year/Number	Player	Games Played
1994/257		879+
1998/171		606+
1999/210		506+
2000/38		257+
2002/58		255+
2002/63		305+
2002/95		290+
2003/132		164+
2004/97		319+
2009/60		0+

Javascript is not currently enabled on your browser.
If you do have Javascript enabled:
This site uses javascript to make the magic happen.
Please turn on javascript and reload this page, or use a more current browser (like Firefox)

Diamonds in the Rough (Red Wings) Quiz

by Hockeymaster

Created Feb 4, 2011 in Sports
Game Plays 69

Friend Scores and Standings

Loading friend results....

Top Games Today in Sports

Top Games with Similar Tags

Top User Games in Sports

	Shaun871:	Feb 4th, 2011 at 22:18 GMT	3 points
	Detroit is definitely the model drafting franchise. Not sure why Tatar is included on here with minimal games. Mursak has played a few more although they're both too young to really be included.

	Hockeymaster:	Feb 4th, 2011 at 22:38 GMT	0 points
	tatar is their best prospect right now. Chances are he'll go on to have a successful career unless he gets injured. Plus I wanted to put someone in from one of the more recent drafts (Otherwise the latest draft would be 2004)

	lukejameslarson:	Feb 5th, 2011 at 00:27 GMT	1 point
	You spelled "Fedorov" "Federov." "Late round (After first round) draft picks that became dependable NHLers for the Wings." At this point, Tatar has failed to do so. You'd be better off listing Darren Helm or Jonathan Ericsson than Tatar. Also, Fleischmann never played a game for the Wings, Kyle Quincey played 13, Knuble played 65, Mckay 73, and Graves played only 78. It's more than a stretch to call any of them dependable NHLers for the Red Wings

	mennoknight:	Feb 5th, 2011 at 04:57 GMT	2 points
	Calling Jiri Hudler a diamond is like calling Valeri Bure a checking forward.