Can you name the owners of these jerseys that will cause an outrage if they were to come true? by GoRedskinz12

Can you name the owners of these jerseys that will cause an outrage if they were to come true?

created by GoRedskinz12

Enter a player (last names acceptable) in the box below
Correctly named players will show up below
Answers do not have to be guessed in order
The answer grid coordinates with the picture
This quiz has not been verified by Sporcle

Popular trivia games today

Famous with Sunglasses

8000

World Capital Border Blitz

4586

Isn't It Ironic?

4471

One-word Movie Mix-and-Match

3312

Word Ladder: Gemstones

3182

Missing Word: Top Grossing Movies (1990)

3047

Clickable 1-100 Mines

2383

Clickable Concentration

2123

And more...

PLAY GAME

02:00

Show Missed Answers

1

2

3

4

Javascript is not currently enabled on your browser.
If you do have Javascript enabled:
This site uses javascript to make the magic happen.
Please turn on javascript and reload this page, or use a more current browser (like Firefox)

You might also like these games:
NFL #1 Draft Picks	NHL Two Team Retired Jerseys	MLB Retired Jerseys

There are 112 comments for this game.
(Warning: comments may contain spoilers)

NFL Jerseys in Hell Quiz

by GoRedskinz12

Created Mar 17, 2010 in Sports
Game Plays 15,035

Friend Scores and Standings

Loading friend results....

Top Games Today in Sports

Top Games with Similar Tags

Top User Games in Sports

Comment below threshold: show it

	GoRedskinz12:	Mar 18th, 2010 at 03:50 GMT		1 point
	My bad. I can see the whole picture without scrolling but maybe it's my browser. I'll reduce the size of it.

	bmo1616:	Mar 18th, 2010 at 03:55 GMT		1 point
	Pretty sure Vikings fans aren't in an outrage about Percy Harvin, but that could just be me.

	GoRedskinz12:	Mar 18th, 2010 at 03:59 GMT		0 points
	No, but Packers fans would be pissed over seeing another former QB go to Minnesota. This quiz is really just a "What-If" scenario just for fun. I know if I heard that Romo joined the Redskins I'd flip my lid.

	StripedWhiteJet:	Mar 18th, 2010 at 04:28 GMT		28 points
	Jamarcus Russell and the Saints? Why? I mean, Matt Ryan makes a lot more sense (division rivals- Falcons and Saints), and shares the same number (2). I'm pretty sure any fan in the league would be pissed to see "Russell" written on the back of their starting QB's jersey.

	Python16:	Mar 18th, 2010 at 04:34 GMT		8 points
	yah i kept typing ryan and couldn't think of anyone else. i dont think the raiders are good enough to have anybody in oakland be outraged to see their players on another team, especially russell

	nut:	Mar 18th, 2010 at 04:41 GMT		18 points
	The Oakland fans wouldn't be the ones getting angry, it's whatever team Russell's on.

	Haushinka:	Mar 18th, 2010 at 05:51 GMT		6 points
	Actually I'm pretty sure Raiders fans don't give a crap about JaMarcus Russell!

	MonteCresta:	Mar 18th, 2010 at 05:53 GMT		1 point
	Romo on the Eagles would be much worse than any of these. Or McNabb on the Cowgirls

	bmcelwee:	Mar 18th, 2010 at 05:58 GMT		-3 points
	safe to say everyone would be mad if mcnabb was a cowgirl

	Castro:	Mar 18th, 2010 at 06:13 GMT		0 points
	Huh, I assumed GoRedskinz12 was a Saints fan, that would definitely be a reason to be outraged if JaMarcus Russell was on the Saints.

	LaCosaNostra:	Mar 18th, 2010 at 06:25 GMT		3 points
	Weak.

Comment below threshold: show it

	yankeessuck8991:	Mar 18th, 2010 at 07:55 GMT		-2 points
	agree, why is russell a bad thing? he went to LSU, i don't think any saints fans would be upset to see him return.....as long as it's as a backup.

	terpnation:	Mar 18th, 2010 at 08:06 GMT		2 points
	yeah the saints one really should be Matt Ryan

	CMart23:	Mar 18th, 2010 at 11:16 GMT		1 point
	Why Jamarcus on the Saints??

	msteele13:	Mar 18th, 2010 at 12:45 GMT		6 points
	this is ridiculous... The worst thing JaMarcus Russell has done to any team is throw 2 picks instead of his usual 3.

	TehD:	Mar 18th, 2010 at 12:57 GMT		6 points
	very odd.

	GoRedskinz12:	Mar 18th, 2010 at 13:02 GMT		18 points
	Ok.....after user suggestions, I've decided to take out Eli Manning and put in McNabb on Cowboys. Also, Michael Vick to the Browns. Why, the Browns of all teams? Well....their nickname is the Dawg Pound, after all. Uh......I'll see myself out.

	Packfan:	Mar 18th, 2010 at 14:00 GMT		5 points
	Well, I guess it's a pretty good quiz. But I think if you're going to give us two minutes make them all be division rivals. I mean, that's so obscure to have Vick on the Browns. It would be more logical to have Roethlisberger on the browns. The Ochocinco one is also pretty hard but it's logical so keep that one. Otherwise, pretty good quiz, I say.

	Masternachos:	Mar 18th, 2010 at 14:23 GMT		11 points
	How's that for a trade? Peyton Manning straight-up for Tom Brady? War might break out.

	metzger:	Mar 18th, 2010 at 14:58 GMT		23 points
	I quit as soon as JOHN ELWAY wasn't the answer for #7 on the Browns.

	Avi Z:	Mar 18th, 2010 at 16:40 GMT		6 points
	who would care if vick played for the browns

	DetroitRockCity:	Mar 18th, 2010 at 17:06 GMT		10 points
	Vick on the Browns is great. That would be ironic I'm sure PETA would make a nice big stink about that

	Colt45:	Mar 18th, 2010 at 17:08 GMT		32 points
	I kept thinking for sure the Browns jersey was Ben Roethlisberger. I thought I was just misspelling it that's why it wasn't appearing.

	cubscardinals:	Mar 18th, 2010 at 17:08 GMT		6 points
	this is a pretty dumb quiz

	BocBoda:	Mar 18th, 2010 at 17:08 GMT		3 points
	It took me a while to figure out the Vick one but that was pretty funny. Also, there's only one L in Rivers' first name.

	actwentysix:	Mar 18th, 2010 at 17:51 GMT		10 points
	Really, Favre going to the Bears would cause an outrage? Wouldn't it be a bigger outrage if the Packer great ended up in someplace like Minnesota... oh... wait, what?

	csl:	Mar 18th, 2010 at 19:56 GMT		4 points
	Yeah, clearly the Raiders fans would be pissed if they picked up Philip Rivers. Total downgrade from what they've got now.

	haileyshigh:	Mar 18th, 2010 at 19:59 GMT		2 points
	i think the vick thing is pretty funny

	lftyg33:	Mar 18th, 2010 at 20:01 GMT		12 points
	i thought #7 on the browns was ben roethlisberger too. vick kinda caught me off-guard...considering every other answer is a division rival

	RedSox34:	Mar 18th, 2010 at 21:25 GMT		0 points
	its cause browns are dogs^ I think romo on the giants is worse than the skins

	conradmcmasters:	Mar 18th, 2010 at 22:45 GMT		2 points
	Why would redskins fans be pissed if Romo was on them? He's way better than anyone they've had in a while. Not that I care for Romo all that much.

	nomuny12:	Mar 18th, 2010 at 23:38 GMT		3 points
	In some cases, it's not really the team getting the player that would cause an outrage, but rather the team he left. For example, Tony Romo being a Redskins would be OK with me, since he's definitely performed better than Campbell. However, I'm sure Cowboy fans wouldn't be too pleased.

	pjkiesner:	Mar 18th, 2010 at 23:56 GMT		-3 points
	HAHAHAHAHA Vick on the browns...priceless

	Mr_T:	Mar 19th, 2010 at 01:02 GMT		8 points
	Yeah, can you imagine if Favre went to the Vikin- okay, wait... Can you imagine if Parcells coached the Cowbo- okay wait...

Comment below threshold: show it

	antlyon:	Mar 19th, 2010 at 01:54 GMT		9 points
	Hines Ward would be a better choice for the Ravens jersey.

	nut:	Mar 19th, 2010 at 02:00 GMT		4 points
	i think roethlisberger on the browns would be much worse, since he's tormented Cleveland more than Vick tormented dogs. plus, Josh Cribbs has shown that a run-first QB can actually do well on that team.