| @slamb: You have managed to combine both ignorance and bigotry in your short comment. There are many respected countries which are democracies and have constitutional monarchies including the UK, Norway, Sweden, Denmark, the Netherlands, Belgium, Spain, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Japan, Thailand, Malaysia, Jamaica, Barbados, Cambodia etc, etc. (The Middle Eastern monarchies are not democracies and do not count.) The countries that are constitutional monarchies do not retain this system either because their populations are stupid or because of tradition. It is because the system is considered to be superior to having a head of state who is part of the political elite with all of the conflicts of interest or potential corruption that this involves (I give you Nixon, Clinton, Mitterand or Chirac as some of the more obvious examples). An alternative would be a purely ceremonial presidential system with the incumbant costs and lack of profile this involves. I am not suggesting that constitutional monarchies are superior to other systems only that they work for a large number of countries. |