Can you name the current Big 4 sports franchises (MLB, NFL, NBA, NHL) which were formed after 1970? by DJC_83

Can you name the current Big 4 sports franchises (MLB, NFL, NBA, NHL) which were formed after 1970?

created by DJC_83

Enter a team (last names acceptable) in the box below
Correctly named teams will show up below
Answers do not have to be guessed in order
Please enter each franchise's current nickname. See first comment for sources.
Source: Not a source, but a quiz for 1960-1970
This quiz has not been verified by Sporcle

Popular trivia games today

Premier League Hat-Trick Minefield (2011-12)

15671

Word Laddyrinth XIII

11763

Word Ladder: Jellystone Mammal

5487

Countries of the World (Redux)

5118

Eurovision Host Cities

4536

Colorful Song Click 'Em

4166

Missing Word: John Hughes Movies

3825

Movie By Cupcake

3337

And more...

04:00

Show Missed Answers

MLB
1977
1977
1993
1993
1998
1998

NFL
1976
1976
1995
1995
1996
2002

NBA
1974
1980
1988
1988
1989
1989
1995
1995
2004

NHL
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1972
1974
1974
1991
1992
1992
1993
1993
1998
1999
2000
2000

Javascript is not currently enabled on your browser.
If you do have Javascript enabled:
This site uses javascript to make the magic happen.
Please turn on javascript and reload this page, or use a more current browser (like Firefox)

Big 4 Sports Teams Formed After 1970 Quiz

by DJC_83

Created May 10, 2010 in Sports
Game Plays 2,379

Friend Scores and Standings

Loading friend results....

Top Games Today in Sports

Top Games with Similar Tags

Top User Games in Sports

	DJC_83:	May 9th, 2010 at 06:23 GMT	2 points
	Sources -- MLB: http://www.baseball-reference.com -- NFL: http://www.pro-football-reference.com -- NBA: http://www.basketball-reference.com -- NHL: http://www.hockey-reference.com -- The franchise formation years given here are as indicated on these sites.

	amwoods13:	May 10th, 2010 at 06:37 GMT	3 points
	Technically, the former Cleveland Browns moved to Baltimore in 1996 and became the Ravens. Cleveland then filed suit against the NFL and it was settled by the NFL awarding a new franchise to Cleveland, which then retained the Cleveland Browns history. The new Cleveland Browns started up in 1999 after 4 years of non-existence.

	DJC_83:	May 10th, 2010 at 06:51 GMT	4 points
	@amwoods13: This I know, and I figured someone would point it out. The NFL has essentially revised history to pretend that the Browns were just inactive for 3 seasons. Since they officially consider the new Browns to be the same as the old Browns, I follow their lead here. Thus the Ravens are treated an expansion franchise, even though they're really not.

	ricestillfumbled:	May 10th, 2010 at 18:17 GMT	0 points
	i agree as well...the nfl and the city of cleveland cant just pretend that the team didnt play. They moved and became the ravens, and the current browns are really only 12 years old

Comment below threshold: show it

	DJC_83:	May 11th, 2010 at 03:12 GMT	5 points
	The Thunder began as the Seattle SuperSonics in 1967.

	drhaase:	May 11th, 2010 at 03:25 GMT	3 points
	the thunder are a weird one. they technically don't own the rights to the SuperSonics name or uni's, but they own the team records, and if another Seattle SuperSonics were to ever exist they would share the records....odd. Thunder would be a good bonus answer maybe

	DJC_83:	May 11th, 2010 at 14:35 GMT	3 points
	Yes, I suppose if the NBA created a new Seattle SuperSonics, they might do what the NFL did with the Browns and act as if the Thunder were a completely new franchise. Until then, though, the Thunder are considered a continuation of the SuperSonics.

Comment below threshold: show it

	Lindsay:	Jun 28th, 2011 at 23:28 GMT	3 points
	Need to switch Thrashers to Jets

	sbshuffler85:	Jul 22nd, 2011 at 12:29 GMT	1 point
	I think the Ravens should be a bonus answer because they aren't really expansion team.

	healy34:	Jul 23rd, 2011 at 22:36 GMT	-1 points
	The Coyotes are going back to Winnipeg, the Thrashers aren't leaving Atlanta and were new on there own.

	Hatfield:	Sep 26th, 2011 at 21:31 GMT	1 point
	I think you should have allowed for former team names to be accepted.