Can you name the 20th Century Assassinations By Date? by Chwian

Date	Victim	Assassin/s
11/22/63		Lee Harvey Oswald (Allegedly)
6/28/14		Gavrilo Princip
2/28/86		Unknown
9/6/01		Leon Frank Czolgosz
12/1/34		Leonid Nikolaev
5/30/61		Unknown
6/6/68		Sirhan Sirhan
5/15/32		Members of the Japanese Military
10/6/81		Khalid Islambouli, et al.
8/20/40		Ramon Mercader

Date	Victim	Assassin/s
7/25/34		A Group of Austrian Nazis
10/31/84		Satwant Singh & Beant Singh
2/21/65		Talmadge Hayer, Norman 3X Butler & Thomas 15X Johnson
11/4/95		Yigal Amir
11/27/78		Dan White
8/22/22		Liam Deasy, et al.
9/10/35		Carl Weiss
5/21/20		Forces of General Rudolfo Herrero
10/26/79		Kim Jae-kyu
4/4/68		James Earl Ray

Javascript is not currently enabled on your browser.
If you do have Javascript enabled:
This site uses javascript to make the magic happen.
Please turn on javascript and reload this page, or use a more current browser (like Firefox)

You might also like these games:
The USA Declares War!	Original 13 Colonies	20th Century by Image

There are 6 comments for this game.
(Warning: comments may contain spoilers)

20th Century Assassinations Quiz

by Chwian

Created Dec 6, 2011 in History
Game Plays 101

Friend Scores and Standings

Loading friend results....

Top Games Today in History

Top Games with Similar Tags

Top User Games in History

	AutonomusPlebian:	Dec 7th, 2011 at 08:04 GMT		3 points
	You shouldn't put allegedy after Oswald, the vast majority of people believe he did kill Kennedy. If you insist on putting allegedy after Oswald, you need to put it after James Earl Ray as there is a lot of doubt over his role, even some of King's relatives dont think he was the killer. In fact, a lot of these have the same level of doubt as Oswald and so therefore need allegedly

	Chwian:	Dec 7th, 2011 at 16:03 GMT		-3 points
	I put "allegedly" in to head off the opposite complaint. I think we can all agree that we're better off without a pointless argument over the assassination, and I think this is the best way to stop it before it starts.

	AutonomusPlebian:	Dec 7th, 2011 at 17:47 GMT		2 points
	I think its fair to say that the vast mahority of people follow the generally accepted belief that it was Oswald. As I said before, virtually all these assassins have some doubters who think someone else was responsible. Are you going to put allegedy after all of them to head off the inevitable debate?

	johnlk:	Dec 7th, 2011 at 18:28 GMT		1 point
	I agree with AutonomousPlebian - just put the widely accepted killer, and who cares if conspiracists are obnoxious about it. Better to alienate them than to alienate non-conspiracists.

	LeRoiSoleil:	Dec 8th, 2011 at 02:29 GMT		1 point
	What about Reinhard Heydrich or John Lennon?

	Hamilton_Burger:	Dec 8th, 2011 at 20:15 GMT		2 points
	I agree with AP--the addition of the "allegedly" when you don't use the same for Ray or others invites, rather than heads off, the pointless argument. And anyway, you've only identified the triggerman in other assassinations in which there was a conspiracy (e.g., Princip). So doing the same with Oswald would be consistent and should therefore satisfy the conspiracy theorists.