Can you name the answers to this forced order logic puzzle? by Buckler

Can you name the answers to this forced order logic puzzle?

created by Buckler

Enter an answer in the box below
Correctly named answers will show up below
Answers MUST be guessed in order
ALERT!: Entering some wrong answers will end the quiz
Source: Solution
There are 25 cells. Nine are numbers: 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9. Each number appears only once. The other 16 cells are Xs. Using logic, find out which cell has what. No guessing required.
Also try: Toughest Logic Puzzle Ever
This quiz has not been verified by Sporcle

Popular trivia games today

Click the Flick

18414

On a Map: Africa

14136

Groups of Five

11949

Wrong Answer Roulette: '90s Movies

8231

Geography Bunker IV

7623

Almost an NFL Team

5785

Word Ladder: Our Lesser Angles

5528

Poorest US States

5429

And more...

PLAY GAME

10:00

Show Missed Answers


A?
B?
C?
D?
E?


F?
G?
H?
I?
J?


K?
L?
M?
N?
O?


P?
Q?
R?
S?
T?


U?
V?
W?
X?
Y?
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y

Javascript is not currently enabled on your browser.
If you do have Javascript enabled:
This site uses javascript to make the magic happen.
Please turn on javascript and reload this page, or use a more current browser (like Firefox)

You might also like these games:
Sporcle Trivia Pyramid	Sporcle Trivia Pyramid II	A Minefield Puzzle

There are 17 comments for this game.
(Warning: comments may contain spoilers)

Forced Order Logic Puzzle Quiz

by Buckler

Created Dec 8, 2012 in Just For Fun
Game Plays 15,346

Friend Scores and Standings

Loading friend results....

Top Games Today in Just For Fun

Top Games with Similar Tags

Top User Games in Just For Fun

	Buckler:	Dec 8th, 2012 at 19:16 GMT		4 points
	There is nothing I can do about the formatting. The only way to force the order is to hide the next clue, and hiding the clue hides the clue's code that makes the boxes bigger. It makes it that more of a challenge. Hopefully it still works.

	Zak6009:	Dec 8th, 2012 at 21:22 GMT		9 points
	Loved it. Took me a while to figure out why X blew me up on G.

	pigheaded1:	Dec 8th, 2012 at 21:37 GMT		9 points
	Amazing that this one worked logically!! It was really challenging and you have made a great game.

	gorbadorba:	Dec 9th, 2012 at 00:23 GMT		2 points
	Mind is blown yet again by Buckler. Didnt know they offered a logic major at the u.

	MikeN:	Dec 9th, 2012 at 19:29 GMT		1 point
	Great puzzle, but I don't like your solution, and think the puzzle should be reworded to avoid it. When you say sum of the second column's numbers, I took that to include the possibility of just one number. You say the word 'numbers' should force an assumption of 2 numbers, thus guaranteeing the 6. This is not needed. If you say 'number or numbers' or some other wording that just means the total of one or more numbers in column 2, YOU STILL GET THE SAME RESULT, only more complicated logic. If you assume only 2, then 468 have to be in 4th column, and just 1 number in 5th row, there is not enough room to put three of 3579 in other columns.

	Zak6009:	Dec 10th, 2012 at 10:48 GMT		2 points
	@MikeN, I (and I think most others as well) actually took into account the possibility of there being just 2, I didn't read the word "numbers" as ruling that out, I just read it as "the sum of everything in column 2", which I think is what Buckler intended as well, not necessarily stating there is more than one number. I think he meant for you to do the thinking you did and work that out yourself that it can't be just 2, otherwise it would be piss-easy if it was given on a silver platter.

	Zak6009:	Dec 10th, 2012 at 10:53 GMT		2 points
	And I don't think the word "numbers" gives that away, if you're talking about a sum, it's only natural in the English language to refer to it as such, even if it's just a sum of one number, so I think rewording isn't really necessary. Or, if the plural should make more sense, you can read it as a sum of that number plus all the X's (as zeroes) ;)

	hazelorb:	Dec 10th, 2012 at 13:15 GMT		2 points
	you can take out the part about which row 8 is in. You can get it without that clue (try to put it anywhere else and the sum is too big). the 2nd half about no row has more than 2 numbers is good. I like that there are no clues after when you need them. nice job.

	MikeN:	Dec 10th, 2012 at 15:47 GMT		1 point
	Zak, Buckler's solution assumes more than one number.

	2Lebrons1Cup:	Dec 10th, 2012 at 16:03 GMT		2 points
	I am so pissed that it took me 6 tries to get through this...I need to read more carefully. AWESOME quiz.

	chrisp28:	Dec 11th, 2012 at 09:01 GMT		1 point
	When entering answer o how do you know its not 7 instead of 9. Clue G says that row can be over 10 so 9 could along that row which is not stated in the solutions?

	alastor:	Dec 11th, 2012 at 20:32 GMT		2 points
	chrisp28, use clue J.

	LacsiraxAriscal:	Jan 3rd, 2013 at 22:50 GMT		1 point
	Why on earth can't G be a guess? Reading your solution, there's one part which says "number can't be in fourth or fifth column". I understand fifth - but fourth? Why not?

	LacsiraxAriscal:	Jan 3rd, 2013 at 22:53 GMT		1 point
	Never mind - got it at last.

	Tenebrae:	Jan 9th, 2013 at 18:35 GMT		1 point
	I decided to give up for the day yesterday (or the day before, I can't remember now) and read the solution - not to use it though. This morning I forgot it, but I was able to use my brain to puzzle through it. Definitely the hardest one yet.

	taylorswift12:	Feb 19th, 2013 at 21:44 GMT		1 point
	to make the boxes bigger type < br > (without the spaces) in the clue hint box. you can add one or two before and after the ?. See if that would work for you (:

	Ubbiebubbie:	Mar 3rd, 2013 at 01:09 GMT		1 point
	^ That's the thing. In forced order, the question marks will always be there regardless of what is actually in the clue box, until you reach that clue. So, as of now, it's formatted the best way possible.