mentally stimulating diversions
Random Quiz
Random Geography
Games
Create
User Created
Go
Most Popular
Newest
By Rating
By Length
By Favorites
By Difficulty
By Tags
Geography
Entertainment
Science
History
Literature
Sports
Language
Just For Fun
Religion
Movies
Television
Music
Gaming
Miscellaneous
Holiday
Can you name the US cities that added the most people between the 2000 census and the 2010 census?
created by
Booger
Enter a city in the box below
Correctly named cities will show up below
Answers do not have to be guessed in order
Includes all cities, towns and villages with populations of at least 50,000 in 2000. CDPs (census designated places) not included.
Source:
US Census Data from 2000 and 2010
Also try:
Shrinking American Cities
Popular trivia games today
Cartoon Therapy
23137
Home Row Key Images
17564
Pandemic Logic Puzzle
10976
2000s Movies by Cast II
9831
Billiard Ball Colors
9573
Word Ladder: Final Exam
9103
Groups of Five
8334
Missing Word: 'In' the Movies
7888
And
more...
PLAY GAME
Enter city:
0
/30 cities correct
08:00
Show Missed Answers
Rank
City
Growth (2000 > 2010 Population)
1
206,512 (534,694 > 741,206)
2
190,596 (540,828 > 731,424)
3
182,761 (1,144,646 > 1,327,407)
4
166,855 (8,008,278 > 8,175,133)
5
145,820 (1,953,631 > 2,099,451)
6
133,828 (656,562 > 790,390)
7
127,799 (276,093 > 403,892)
8
124,587 (1,321,045 > 1,445,632)
9
105,322 (478,434 > 583,756)
10
101,473 (115,488 > 216,961)
11
100,426 (247,057 > 347,483)
12
98,756 (109,697 > 208,453)
13
97,801 (3,694,820 > 3,792,621)
14
97,245 (448,607 > 545,852)
15
86,167 (735,617 > 821,784)
Rank
City
Growth (2000 > 2010 Population)
16
85,459 (563,662 > 649,121)
17
84,002 (1,223,400 > 1,307,402)
18
82,348 (175,381 > 257,729)
19
79,549 (121,015 > 200,564)
20
76,748 (54,369 > 131,117)
21
75,834 (88,769 > 164,603)
22
75,563 (711,470 > 787,033)
23
73,867 (506,132 > 579,999)
24
70,360 (173,556 > 243,916)
25
69,303 (143,072 > 212,375)
26
67,140 (128,929 > 196,069)
27
67,013 (427,652 > 494,665)
28
59,542 (176,581 > 236,123)
29
59,515 (176,576 > 236,091)
30
59,470 (407,018 > 466,488)
59,470 (407,018 > 466,488)
59,470 (407,018 > 466,488)
59,470 (407,018 > 466,488)
Javascript is not currently enabled on your browser.
If you do have Javascript enabled:
HIDE THIS WARNING
This site uses javascript to make the magic happen.
Please turn on javascript and reload this page, or use a more current browser (like
Firefox
)
You might also like these games:
US Foreign-Born Population
Arizona Cities
Confederate Cities (1860)
Loading...
There are
61 comments
for this game.
(Warning: comments may contain spoilers)
Growing American Cities Quiz
by
Booger
Created Apr 25, 2011 in
Geography
Featured May 13, 2011
Game Plays 61,152
Embed Game
Report a Mistake
Tags
City Quizzes
Population Quizzes
2010
growing
growth
between
America
2000
added
census
Archived comments:
show them
gowhere
:
Apr 25th, 2011 at 18:12 GMT
16 points
From an ecological standpoint, this is a pretty scary list. The populations of cities which already have sustainability problems (i.e., those in desert areas) is increasing. Where is the water going to come from?
penguinflying
:
Apr 26th, 2011 at 11:32 GMT
1 point
Great quiz! Typo in #10: 101,473 (115,488 > 216,961)
MisterF
:
Apr 26th, 2011 at 14:50 GMT
2 points
Is Louisville disqualified for some reason? I'm not sure if it is technically considered a CDP, or if it was disqualified for merging with Jefferson County in 2003, but by population change alone it would definitely be #1.
carbon_rod
:
Apr 26th, 2011 at 15:12 GMT
2 points
You've got 2010 twice in the header for the Growth column.
Onno
:
Apr 26th, 2011 at 15:33 GMT
2 points
@MisterF: It's not a CDP so I think it's disqualified because of the merge indeed. But what do you mean by "population change alone"? Jefferson County only gained 47,500 people from 2000-2010.
Booger
:
Apr 26th, 2011 at 15:53 GMT
2 points
Louisville merged with Jefferson County. The 2000 number is for Louisville only and the 2010 number is for combined Louisville/Jefferson County. Even with the merger, comparing apples to apples, the area that is presently Louisville/Jefferson County would not make the list.
aaaandrew
:
Apr 26th, 2011 at 20:16 GMT
2 points
It would be interesting to see which cities also lost the most people.
Pillowmint
:
Apr 26th, 2011 at 20:49 GMT
6 points
Interesting that Fort Worth grew so much but Dallas isn't on the list at all.
Suffron_SD
:
Apr 29th, 2011 at 15:23 GMT
2 points
If you lived in Fort Worth you would know why. I love Fort Worth. I wouldn't live in Dallas unless I had absolutely no choice. Plus Dallas is pretty much maxed out. There's tons of room around Fort Worth to grow and build. Dallas is on the list, anyway, in the form of McKinney and the bonus answer Frisco, which wasn't big enough in 2000 to make the list but grew by 83,000 people.
DMwahoo
:
May 5th, 2011 at 20:20 GMT
6 points
I live in Virginia but have been making trips to the beach in South Carolina a few times a year for a while now, and I have to say Charlotte's immense growth was pretty obvious just by driving through and around it. I've also been there a couple times and it's a pretty nice city, someplace I could definitely see myself moving too when I'm done with school.
Game published: May 13th, 2011 at 04:03 GMT
MrCaliChicago
:
May 13th, 2011 at 04:58 GMT
49 points
I can't believe so many people would move to places with no water and highs of 110 degrees.
DTNelson
:
May 13th, 2011 at 06:02 GMT
16 points
@MrCaliChicago: Most of those people are moving from places that are hotter and drier, places to the south of the southwest US.
PK9
:
May 13th, 2011 at 06:14 GMT
2 points
Sacramento surprises the heck out of me. Usually growing markets aren't the ones that are at risk of losing their professional sports teams...
Lolo76
:
May 13th, 2011 at 06:27 GMT
2 points
@PK9: Sacramento doesn't surprise me at all, since I'm from the Bay Area... and I know MANY people who've relocated to Sacramento, mostly because it's cheap (compared to SF/SJ) but still close to the bay & a "real" city. I even considered moving there myself, until I - very luckily - found a job near San Jose. Whew!
Lolo76
:
May 13th, 2011 at 06:34 GMT
7 points
@MrCaliChicago: As we say in the west, "at least it's a dry heat!" ;-) I've also lived on the Atlantic coast, and I'll take 110F in CA/AZ over 80F in Maryland ANY day.
Comment below threshold:
show it
Mick9
:
May 13th, 2011 at 06:59 GMT
-9 points
My top places to live are NYC area, Savannah GA, or the Southwest. I guess I follow most of the population! :p
franktank26
:
May 13th, 2011 at 07:28 GMT
12 points
@Lolo76: After living in Dallas/Ft. Worth with "blow torch" wind and scalding hot outdoor surfaces, I'll still take the Chicago/Illinois humidity over the caveats of "dry heat."
Teary_Ennui
:
May 13th, 2011 at 10:55 GMT
17 points
Surprised to see Columbus on here - try the shrinking cities quiz and you'll see a lot in Ohio
web250
:
May 13th, 2011 at 12:13 GMT
-4 points
This should be by percentage growth, not raw growth
DyslexicGod
:
May 13th, 2011 at 12:15 GMT
-4 points
Texas got 4.3 million new residents last decade, more than California, New York and Illinois combined. The economy is flourishing here, and the big cities have become technological hubs. Plus, Austin is the coolest city in the U.S....and it snows like 3 days every decade, people have to get sick of dealing with snow in the north so many months every year.
caramba
:
May 13th, 2011 at 12:25 GMT
6 points
@
web250
:
Booger
did that one - http://www.sporcle.com/games/Booger/fastest-growing-american-cities
Raynard
:
May 13th, 2011 at 12:45 GMT
3 points
@Booger: I find it very patriotic how you made the color scheme red white and blue.
joshmassey
:
May 13th, 2011 at 13:02 GMT
11 points
Houston's inclusion on this list = New Orleans' inclusion on the other one.
msantos1116
:
May 13th, 2011 at 13:16 GMT
10 points
What about Louisville? They consolidated their county into the city and grew by about half a million. I guess it's not the same thing, but for statistical purposes according to the US Census, it should be the top "gainer".
msantos1116
:
May 13th, 2011 at 13:39 GMT
-2 points
@MrCaliChicago: "I can't believe so many people would move to places with no water and highs of 110 degrees." Cost of living is much more affordable when you don't have access to water. Most places in the northeast are already built out almost as much as they possibly can be.
Comment below threshold:
show it
CraigR
:
May 13th, 2011 at 13:43 GMT
-9 points
i'm surprised Florida isn't on the list with the aging demographic of the US
debbiedoesnothin
:
May 13th, 2011 at 14:42 GMT
7 points
@CraigR: With health care costs skyrocketing, old people can't afford to relocate anymore. Young people with families are moving to the southwest for jobs and lower cost of living. When I watch House Hunters, I'm shocked by how expensive homes are in Florida and how cheap they are in Texas. Plus fewer gators.
Booger
:
May 13th, 2011 at 14:59 GMT
2 points
@msantos1116: Look at my comment in the archived section regarding Louisville.
croquembouche
:
May 13th, 2011 at 15:25 GMT
5 points
Thanks for making Frisco a bonus answer :) Lived in the Dallas area between 1998 and 2007 and that place got so huge quick due to the spillout from Plano.
adrian96
:
May 13th, 2011 at 15:51 GMT
-2 points
Was it wrong to guess New Orleans? :p
jmatt22397
:
May 13th, 2011 at 16:20 GMT
-1 points
@MrCaliChicago: I used to live in Arizona, AZ and Southern California's weather is awesome. From about October to February its pretty much 70 degrees every day. The summers are hot, but I'll take 110 over 90 and humid any day.
crew1996
:
May 13th, 2011 at 16:46 GMT
7 points
@Teary_Ennui: Columbus is where the rest of Ohio moves to get a job. I know so many people born and raised in Cleveland and Akron it's not funny.
Comment below threshold:
show it
jshorne
:
May 13th, 2011 at 17:40 GMT
[Comment deleted by admins]
QuintFan
:
May 13th, 2011 at 19:01 GMT
1 point
I would never have guessed most of these places, they're kind of random. Very surprised to see Port St. Lucie, FL...I lived right over the bridge from it in Vero Beach for 2 years and I gotta say: there is NOTHING there, and it's not even a nice little beach town, it's basically low income (though I guess that's who the growth rate is) :-/.
Comment below threshold:
show it
MoneyGrip
:
May 13th, 2011 at 19:07 GMT
-10 points
Charlotte is literally the most boring city I've ever visited, however, living in proximity of New York and Philadelphia has probably spoiled me for life.
TheBigE1980
:
May 13th, 2011 at 19:45 GMT
2 points
Surprise, AZ is a bonus and it is misspelled.
trekkie4christ
:
May 13th, 2011 at 20:49 GMT
0 points
I never even considered Laredo; though a lot may come from the human trafficking rings that run through there.
yankeespurs101
:
May 13th, 2011 at 20:54 GMT
3 points
Haha the front page comment cracks me up!
Bobman1
:
May 13th, 2011 at 20:58 GMT
-1 points
No ofense, but I think the 50,000 population cut-off is a bit low. I was in the 94th percentile and didn't even hit half right--never heard of 4-6 of the smaller bergs. 100k, 150k might make more sense. It kills me that I whiffed on Dallas but Ft. Worth was in there. Argh. Inclusion of Columbus IS interesting--I left the rust belt off entirely, but did try a few college towns, just in case.
theGrit
:
May 13th, 2011 at 21:11 GMT
3 points
My whole life I've heard that Fresno is a terrible place. I've never been there, so I have no idea. But I wonder what changed. Anyone?
Like us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Follow us on Google+
2007-13 © Sporcle, Inc.
About
 |
Advertise
 |
Feedback
 |
Blog
 |
FAQ
 |
Embed
 |
Sporcle Live!
 |
News
 |
Terms
 |
Jobs
 |
Privacy
 
Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties
Go to the Sporcle.com Mobile Site →