Can you name the Top 50 Active NFL Players According To Fan Nation?

Team / Position	Players	Ranking / Indication
Indianapolis Colts - QB		1^
Pittsburgh Steelers - SS		2*
New York Jets - CB		3*
San Francisco 49ers - MLB		4*
Baltimore Ravens - FS		5*
New England Patroits - QB		6^
Minnesota Vikings - RB		7^
Tennessee Titans - RB		8^
New Orleans Saints - QB		9^
Denver Brocos - OT		10^
Pittsburgh Steelers - OLB		11*
Minnesota Vikings - DT		12*
Minnesota Vikings - OG		13^
Houston Texans - WR		14^
Oakland Raiders - CB		15*
Dallas Cowboys - OLB		16*
Cleveland Browns - OT		17^
Minnesota Vikings - DE		18*
Green Bay Packers - CB		19*
Arizona Cardinals - WR		20^
Washington Redskins - DT		21^
Arizona Cardinals - SS		22*
Baltimore Ravens - MLB		23*
New York Jets - DT		24*
Indianapolis Colts - C		25^

Team / Position	Players	Ranking / Indication
Carolina Panthers - MLB		26^
Pittsburgh Steelers - QB		27^
Indianapolis Colts - DE		28^
Denver Broncos - CB		29*
New York Jets - OG		30^
San Diego Chargers - QB		31^
Green Bay Packers - QB		32^
Carolina Panthers - DE		33*
Cleveland Browns - DT		34*
Indianapolis Colts - WR		35^
Jacksonville Jaguars - RB		36^
Minnesota Vikings - DT		37*
Indianapolis Colts - TE		38^
San Diego Chargers - TE		39^
New York Jets - C		40^
Philadelphia Eagles - CB		41*
St. Louis Rams - RB		42^
Chicago Bears - MLB		43*
Minnesota Vikings - QB		44^
New England Patroits - WR		45^
Dallas Cowboys - QB		46^
Pittsburgh Steelers - DT		47*
New Orleans Saints - FS		48*
Oakland Raiders - P		49^
Dallas Cowboys - TE		50^

Javascript is not currently enabled on your browser.
If you do have Javascript enabled:
This site uses javascript to make the magic happen.
Please turn on javascript and reload this page, or use a more current browser (like Firefox)

Top 50 Active NFL Players Quiz

Rating:	Nominate Report game
Created by: Bdogrox2 -
Contributed: March 14th, 2010
Category: Sports
Plays: 4,443

Tags: Football Quizzes, NFL Quizzes, team, player, top, active, Top 50, ranking, indication

Loading friend results....

Comment below threshold: show it

	godpaul28:	Mar 14th, 2010 at 15:43 GMT	3 points
	Willis is disgustingly good, what are you talking about? Agree with Thomas though, Faneca, Saturday, Mangold, and Hutchinson all should be above him. Not so sure Lechler should be on here instead of people like Wes Welker, Frank Gore, etc

	XsupX:	Mar 14th, 2010 at 17:04 GMT	6 points
	peppers is on the bears

	mwolfe86:	Mar 14th, 2010 at 17:07 GMT	2 points
	@godpaul28: I'm a huge Jets fan, but Thomas really is that good. He should absolutely be ranked above Faneca and Mangold, at the very least.

	CMart23:	Mar 14th, 2010 at 17:27 GMT	1 point
	Antonio Gates is better than Dallas Clark IMO

Comment below threshold: show it

	PerryAhn:	Mar 14th, 2010 at 21:10 GMT	-1 points
	polamalu, reed, harrison, & saturday are too high. faneca, bailey, rogers, urlacher, and lechler shouldn't be on this list (based on 2009 form). fitzgerald is ridiculously low. haloti ngata, calvin johnson, and jake long should make this list.

	nageorge03:	Mar 14th, 2010 at 21:35 GMT	0 points
	dont even bother w/ this joke of a quiz maker, just took the NBA version of this. dont even bother looking. simply atrocious

	gmen10:	Mar 15th, 2010 at 00:36 GMT	-2 points
	Hooby you make yourself sound like an idiot with that comment. however, i could not agree more with PerryAhn's statement. the fact that a guy who missed the entire season in Urlacher makes the list is ridiculous and Polamalu was plagued by injuries as well last year.

	godpaul28:	Mar 15th, 2010 at 01:24 GMT	3 points
	gmen, I think this quiz is who are the best players in the league, not who had the best year last year. You seem confused.

	saf5109:	Mar 15th, 2010 at 03:13 GMT	3 points
	The indicator for offensive and defensive players was really amusing haha. Am I the only one surprised with the omission of Mario Williams?

	phdstudent:	Mar 15th, 2010 at 03:40 GMT	1 point
	No punters should make any list of 50 best football players. I definitely think that Joe Thomas should be as high as he is. I am shocked that Ngata and Mario Williams aren't on this list, or Roddy White and Vincent Jackson (though WRs are always overrated).

	donnyp17:	Mar 15th, 2010 at 04:36 GMT	0 points
	this list really blows

	nomuny12:	Mar 15th, 2010 at 07:41 GMT	10 points
	Any kind of sports quiz with this type is never really good, because even with a source it's still just opinion. It's just not the quiz creator's opinion. Some sports writers make a living making dumb predictions and stating inaccurate facts. Having ^ and * for offensive/defensive players is redundant because you're already telling us the position they play in the description.

Comment below threshold: show it

	mybeaglebelle:	Mar 15th, 2010 at 13:36 GMT	6 points
	Trying to get us to spell "Asomugha" is pure evil.

	mybeaglebelle:	Mar 15th, 2010 at 13:37 GMT	0 points
	Also, I have only one problem with the list; I think that Rodgers is better than Rivers. Rivers is too inconsistent and can't win in the playoffs.

	godpaul28:	Mar 15th, 2010 at 14:13 GMT	0 points
	I don't remember Rodgers winning anything in the playoffs

	alpha:	Mar 15th, 2010 at 14:42 GMT	0 points
	Yes, because that loss was totally Rodgers fault. I mean he only threw for 423 yards, 4 touchdowns, 10 yds per ATTEMPT(15.1 per completion) and a 121 passer rating. He should have done a much better job rushing the passer. I mean he never touched Warner. Rivers, on the other hand, has had 2 really good games, 1 mediocre game and 4 pretty bad games

Comment below threshold: show it

	TheFoxManCometh:	Mar 15th, 2010 at 17:15 GMT	3 points
	Steve Smith, though he's had a couple down years because of Delhomme, is without a doubt the most athletic receiver in the game after Fitzgerald. Having said that, its a shame neither he or Andre Johnson made this list. Lechler? Come on.

	nomuny12:	Mar 15th, 2010 at 18:08 GMT	5 points
	Well....when you play on a ****ty team like Oakland you get plenty of practice as a punter. It's the only position in all of sports where you get rewarded because your team sucks. Have you ever heard of the Saint's, Colt's or Patriot's punter? Yeah, me neither. BTW, I mean that with the utmost respect to Raider fans here. I have zero room to talk, considering that at one point last season the punter on my team had more rushing TDs than the starting running back, and threw a better deep ball than the starting quarterback.

	saf5109:	Mar 15th, 2010 at 18:25 GMT	2 points
	How is Fitzgerald below Woodson after torching him in the playoffs?

	Brian:	Mar 15th, 2010 at 18:36 GMT	3 points
	It really goes to show how bad the Seahawks are when they don't have a single player on here.

	EmperorMikhail:	Mar 15th, 2010 at 19:28 GMT	2 points
	If any PUNTER should be on the list, it's BRIAN MOORMAN

	kyle_h_2007:	Mar 15th, 2010 at 21:17 GMT	2 points
	this is a horrible list, how did you come up with this?

Comment below threshold: show it

	Koumori:	Mar 15th, 2010 at 21:53 GMT	0 points
	its debatable if lechler should be on this list. for one thing, i don't know if punters should be on the list at all, plus the best punter in the league is Brian Moorman

	Eagle3:	Mar 15th, 2010 at 22:46 GMT	0 points
	The best PUNTER is Mike Scifres. The strongest leg is Lechler. Scifres has the best combination of leg and the ability to pin the ball inside the 10 yard line. Also, if you were picking a team on NFL Street as of this year and you needed a running back and a middle line backer, who would you choose if both Ray Rice and Brian Urlacher were available? Rate UP for Rice and DOWN for Urlacher.

	dlte:	Mar 15th, 2010 at 22:53 GMT	2 points
	where's josh cribbs?

	CoolerKing:	Mar 16th, 2010 at 00:20 GMT	2 points
	^Cribbs definately should be on here. As well as many other players. **** list.

	brrap_brrap:	Mar 16th, 2010 at 01:20 GMT	1 point
	Alan Faneca even sniffing this list is a joke.

	kbowe:	Mar 16th, 2010 at 01:31 GMT	1 point
	You misspelled Broncos for the #10 player...and it's too bad there are no Giants on this list

	SportsGuy21:	Mar 16th, 2010 at 02:38 GMT	2 points
	Is this supposed to be hard? Make this like 2 minutes to give us a challenge.

	jmwhitestripes12:	Mar 16th, 2010 at 04:27 GMT	2 points
	with all my heart and soul i could have never guessed that patrick willis was a better player then brett favre..

	Packfan:	Mar 16th, 2010 at 05:21 GMT	1 point
	Fist of all, I would like to agree with TheFoxMan. It is really sad that Andre Johnson didn't make this after being one of the best players in the game. and to Emperor and Eagle THE BEST PUNTER IS SHANE LECHLER. I don't care how you look at it, poll people look at statistics but Lechler deserves this list unlike players such as Beason and the others I mentioned in my previous comment. I also agree with Jim white stripes. It's amazing that they ranked Willis above League MVP and Super Bowl winning quarterback Brett Favre. I must say to some of the other commentors on this list such as CMart and Phdstudent and all you people out there who don't think punters are important enough to make this list need to re-think the NFL. I would encourage all of you to become NFL head coaches and play a game without a sufficient punter. Every position on a team is relevant and deserves recognition.

	godpaul28:	Mar 16th, 2010 at 05:32 GMT	-1 points
	Hey all I was saying is that beagle said she thought Rodgers should be ahead of Rivers because Rivers can't win in the playoffs. Rivers has actually won a playoff game, Rodgers hasn't. There are other arguments of why Rodgers should be higher, but that isn't one of them. After the big 3 QBs it's definitely Rodgers and Rivers (i'd have them tied for 4th). And if you want to be technical, Rodgers was the last Packer to touch the ball in that game, and the defense was on the sideline, so yeah I guess he did lose that game

	Packfan:	Mar 16th, 2010 at 14:09 GMT	1 point
	Yeah of course. They went into overtime. It might have helped if earlier in the game the defense had maybe made some stops. Then the game wouldn't have even gone into overtime. By the way you mentioned that he was the last Packer to touch the ball. On that last play Dansby came up the middle and yanked on Rodgers' facemask forcing the fumble. But the refs were too involved in seeing the fumble and who was about to win than watching for blatant penalties.

	heyguys:	Mar 16th, 2010 at 18:58 GMT	1 point
	ware is way too low