Questions | Answers |
Under which a government cannot be sued without its consent--still survives all jurisdictions, but most governments have consented, by statute, to suits for many kinds of torts. | |
More than ___ jurisdictions allow a child to sue a parent for Negligent Driving. | |
In homeowner and automobile liability policies, Isurance companies for decdes have included... | |
When involving insurance in an action between parent and child, the claim is more likely to... | |
The Common Law Notion that 'husband and wife are one' gave rise to this... | |
The answer to #5 has (1) Withered and lost its appeal, or (2) remains steadfast and jurisdictionally relevant | |
When insurance is involved, the action between parent and child is not truly | |
The issue with minors suing their parents for negligence is that the minor's recovery permits a _______ _______ for both the child and the parents being sued. | |
Parental immunity (Will/Does Not) apply to intentional sexual torts. | |
Like Spousal Immuity, the once-prevalent doctrine that unemancipated minors could not sue their parents for most torts is fading fast or lessening. | |
If a child is permitted to do cartwheels in Baymeadows Rd., the mother cannot be sued for ___________ __________ because one almost always claim that a child's carelessness resulte | |
In Rousey v. Rousey, what are the two main reasons the court provides supporting Parental Immunity? _____________________ and ___________________ | |
The court's discussion in Holytz v. City of Milwaukee, on US v. Old English, municipality may be immune or liable depending upon whether we determine that the particular function i | |
The concern is not solely on the possibility of fictitious tortious actions, rather the concern is that the prospect of financial benefit to the defendant may cause the defendnat t | |
Parental Immunity is an outmoded concept and the court in Rousey refused to adopt this doctrine because you cannot sue yourself. How can this be? | |
The sovereign is immune because... | |
In 1977 the American Law Institute completely rejected general tort immunity between parent and child when it published Rest.2d 895G stating: | |
What is the Holding of Rousey v. Rousey? | |
Comments