Can you name the MLB WAR Top Ten? by AlexMurillo

Can you name the MLB WAR Top Ten?

created by AlexMurillo

Enter an answer in the box below
Correctly named answers will show up below
Answers do not have to be guessed in order
Source: Link
Note: 2012 statistics are updated through September 20th, and will be updated as final at the end of the regular season.
This quiz has not been verified by Sporcle

Popular trivia games today

Symbol Match Minefield

46285

The 'Wolf Pack' Toast

23094

4-6 Letter States

20358

Accidental Inventions

16340

Countries of the World (Redux)

13343

Multiple Guess Board Games

11766

Word Ladder: Crossing A Street

10660

Missing Word: Top Grossing Movies (1991)

8399

And more...

PLAY GAME

20:00

Show Missed Answers

Year		Team
#1 - 2012 (10.1)		LAA
#2 - 2012 (6.9)		DET
#3 (tie) - 2012 (6.8)		STL
#3 (tie) - 2012 (6.8)		PIT
#3 (tie) - 2012 (6.8)		NYY
#6 (tie) - 2012 (6.6)		SF
# 6 (tie) - 2012 (6.6)		MIL
#8 - 2012 (6.5)		DET
#9 - 2012 (6.3)		NYM
#10 - 2012 (6.0)		TEX
#1 - 2011 (8.8)		PHI
#2 - 2011 (8.5)		TB
#3 - 2011 (8.3)		PHI
#4 - 2011 (8.2)		DET
#5 - 2011 (8.0)		BOS
#6 (tie) - 2011 (7.8)		LAD
#6 (tie) - 2011 (7.8)		BOS
#8 (tie) - 2011 (7.7)		TOR
#8 (tie) - 2011 (7.7)		MIL
#10 - 2011 (7.3)		DET
#1 - 2010 (8.4)		TEX
#2 - 2010 (8.1)		PHI
#3 (tie) - 2010 (7.8)		TB
#3 (tie) - 2010 (7.8)		NYY
#5 - 2010 (7.4)		BOS
#6 - 2010 (7.3)		STL
#7 - 2010 (7.1)		COL
#8 - 2010 (7.0)		NYY
#9 - 2010 (6.8)		SEA
#10 - 2010 (6.7)		CIN
#1 - 2009 (10.1)		KC
#2 - 2009 (9.4)		STL
#3 - 2009 (8.3)		TB
#4 - 2009 (8.0)		PHI
#5 - 2009 (7.6)		MIN
#6 - 2009 (7.5)		LAA
#7 - 2009 (7.2)		SF
#8 (tie) - 2009 (7.1)		FLA
#8 (tie) - 2009 (7.1)		WSH
#8 (tie) - 2009 (7.1)		FLA
#1 - 2008 (9.0)		STL
#2 - 2008 (8.8)		PHI
#3 - 2008 (7.8)		SF
#4 - 2008 (7.5)		ATL/LAA
#5 (tie) - 2008 (7.1)		ATL
#5 (tie) - 2008 (7.1)		BAL
#7 - 2008 (6.9)		NYM
#8 (tie) - 2008 (6.8)		CLE/MIL
#8 (tie) - 2008 (6.8)		BOS
#10 (tie) - 2008 (6.7)		NYM
#10 (tie) - 2008 (6.7)		NYM
#1 - 2007 (9.2)		NYY
#2 - 2007 (8.5)		STL
#3 - 2007 (8.1)		NYM
#4 - 2007 (7.7)		PHI
#5 - 2007 (7.4)		ATL
#6 - 2007 (7.2)		DET
#7 - 2007 (6.9)		DET
#8 - 2007 (6.8)		TB
#9 - 2007 (6.6)		SD
#10 - 2007 (6.5)		COL
#1 - 2006 (8.2)		STL
#2 - 2006 (8.0)		NYM
#3 - 2006 (7.3)		MIN
#4 - 2006 (7.1)		PHI
#5 - 2006 (6.7)		CIN
#6 - 2006 (6.6)		ARI
#7 - 2006 (6.5)		CLE
#8 - 2006 (6.0)		TOR
#9 - 2006 (5.9)		WSH
#10 - 2006 (5.8)		HOU
#1 - 2005 (9.1)		NYY
#2 (tie) - 2005 (8.2)		FLA
#2 (tie) - 2005 (8.2)		STL
#4 - 2005 (8.0)		HOU
#5 - 2005 (7.5)		CHC
#6 (tie) - 2005 (7.0)		BAL
#6 (tie) - 2005 (7.0)		PHI
#6 (tie) - 2005 (7.0)		TEX

Year		Team
#9 - 2005 (6.8)		MIN
#10 - 2005 (6.5)		ATL
#1 - 2004 (10.4)		SF
#2 - 2004 (9.3)		LAD
#3 - 2004 (9.0)		SEA
#4 - 2004 (8.9)		STL
#5 - 2004 (8.5)		MIN
#6 - 2004 (8.3)		STL
#7 (tie) - 2004 (8.1)		ATL
#7 (tie) - 2004 (8.1)		COL
#9 - 2004 (7.9)		ARI
#10 - 2004 (7.4)		BOS
#1 - 2003 (8.9)		SF
#2 - 2003 (8.4)		STL
#3 - 2003 (8.1)		TEX
#4 - 2003 (7.8)		CHC
#5 (tie) - 2003 (7.7)		BOS
#5 (tie) - 2003 (7.7)		ATL
#7 - 2003 (7.6)		TOR
#8 - 2003 (7.1)		OAK
#9 - 2003 (6.9)		CHW
#10 (tie) - 2003 (6.6)		ATL
#10 (tie) - 2003 (6.6)		ATL
#1 - 2002 (11.6)		SF
#2 - 2002 (10.2)		ARI
#3 - 2002 (8.6)		TEX
#4 - 2002 (8.2)		ARI
#5 - 2002 (7.1)		CLE
#6 - 2002 (7.0)		BOS
#7 - 2002 (6.9)		SF
#8 (tie) - 2002 (6.8)		TOR
#8 (tie) - 2002 (6.8)		NYY
#8 (tie) - 2002 (6.8)		OAK
#8 (tie) - 2002 (6.8)		MTL
#1 - 2001 (11.6)		SF
#2 - 2001 (10.1)		CHC
#3 - 2001 (9.2)		ARI
#4 - 2001 (8.8)		OAK
#5 - 2001 (8.5)		SEA
#6 - 2001 (8.2)		ARI
#7 - 2001 (8.1)		TEX
#8 - 2001 (7.8)		ARI
#9 - 2001 (7.6)		COL
#10 (tie) - 2001 (7.5)		SEA
#10 (tie) - 2001 (7.5)		COL
#1 - 2000 (11.4)		BOS
#2 - 2000 (10.1)		SEA
#3 - 2000 (8.6)		COL
#4 - 2000 (8.2)		ANA
#5 - 2000 (8.0)		ATL
#6 - 2000 (7.8)		ARI
#7 (tie) - 2000 (7.5)		ANA
#7 (tie) - 2000 (7.5)		SF
#9 - 2000 (7.4)		OAK
#10 - 2000 (7.1)		BOS
#1 - 1999 (9.5)		BOS
#2 - 1999 (8.3)		ARI
#3 - 1999 (7.8)		NYY
#4 - 1999 (7.6)		HOU
#5 - 1999 (7.2)		HOU
#6 - 1999 (7.1)		CLE
#7 - 1999 (7.0)		CLE
#8 - 1999 (6.8)		ATL
#9 (tie) - 1999 (6.7)		ATL
#9 (tie) - 1999 (6.7)		ANA/OAK
#1 - 1998 (8.8)		SD
#2 - 1998 (8.3)		SEA
#3 - 1998 (7.9)		SF
#4 - 1998 (7.8)		TOR
#5 (tie) - 1998 (7.3)		NYM
#5 (tie) - 1998 (7.3)		NYY
#7 - 1998 (7.2)		STL
#8 (tie) - 1998 (7.1)		MTL
#8 (tie) - 1998 (7.1)		ATL
#8 (tie) - 1998 (7.1)		OAK
#1 - 1997 (11.8)		TOR
#2 - 1997 (9.6)		COL
#3 - 1997 (9.3)		HOU
#4 - 1997 (8.9)		SEA

Year		Team
#5 (tie) - 1997 (8.5)		LAD
#5 (tie) - 1997 (8.5)		MTL
#7 (tie) - 1997 (8.0)		NYY
#7 (tie) - 1997 (8.0)		SF
#9 - 1997 (7.7)		SEA
#10 (tie) - 1997 (7.5)		ATL
#10 (tie) - 1997 (7.5)		HOU
#1 - 1996 (9.5)		SEA
#2 - 1996 (9.4)		SF
#3 - 1996 (9.2)		SEA
#4 - 1996 (8.4)		MIN
#5 - 1996 (8.2)		TOR
#6 - 1996 (7.8)		NYM
#7 - 1996 (7.7)		COL
#8 - 1996 (7.6)		FLA
#9 (tie) - 1996 (7.5)		BOS
#9 (tie) - 1996 (7.5)		ATL
#1 - 1995 (9.4)		ATL
#2 - 1995 (8.3)		SEA
#3 - 1995 (8.1)		BOS
#4 - 1995 (7.3)		SF
#5 (tie) - 1995 (6.7)		TOR/NYY
#5 (tie) - 1995 (6.7)		SEA
#7 - 1995 (6.6)		CLE
#8 (tie) - 1995 (6.4)		CIN
#8 (tie) - 1995 (6.4)		MIN
#10 - 1995 (6.3)		CAL
#1 - 1994 (8.5)		ATL
#2 - 1994 (7.9)		HOU
#3 - 1994 (7.1)		CLE
#4 - 1994 (6.7)		SEA
#5 - 1994 (6.6)		KC
#6 - 1994 (6.2)		CHW
#7 - 1994 (6.0)		SF
#8 - 1994 (5.8)		BOS
#9 - 1994 (5.6)		NYM
#10 - 1994 (5.5)		CLE
#1 - 1993 (9.8)		CIN
#2 - 1993 (9.7)		SF
#3 - 1993 (9.0)		KC
#4 - 1993 (8.5)		SEA
#5 - 1993 (8.2)		CAL
#6 - 1993 (7.4)		TOR
#7 - 1993 (7.3)		CLE
#8 - 1993 (6.9)		KC
#9 - 1993 (6.8)		LAD
#10 - 1993 (6.7)		CAL
#1 - 1992 (9.1)		CHC
#2 - 1992 (8.9)		PIT
#3 - 1992 (8.4)		BOS
#4 - 1992 (7.9)		BAL
#5 - 1992 (7.7)		KC
#6 - 1992 (7.6)		CHC
#7 - 1992 (6.8)		MIN
#8 (tie) - 1992 (6.7)		PHI
#8 (tie) - 1992 (6.7)		CHW
#10 - 1992 (6.4)		TOR
#1 - 1991 (11.3)		BAL
#2 - 1991 (9.0)		ATL
#3 - 1991 (7.7)		BOS
#4 - 1991 (7.6)		PIT
#5 - 1991 (7.4)		CAL
#6 - 1991 (7.0)		CAL
#7 - 1991 (6.9)		SEA
#8 (tie) - 1991 (6.8)		CLE/TOR
#8 (tie) - 1991 (6.8)		CHW
#8 (tie) - 1991 (6.8)		CHC
#1 - 1990 (10.3)		BOS
#2 - 1990 (9.8)		OAK
#3 - 1990 (9.5)		PIT
#4 - 1990 (8.8)		PHI
#5 - 1990 (7.5)		CAL
#6 - 1990 (7.3)		BAL
#7 - 1990 (6.9)		CHC
#8 - 1990 (6.8)		SD
#9 (tie) - 1990 (6.5)		TEX
#9 (tie) - 1990 (6.5)		DET

Javascript is not currently enabled on your browser.
If you do have Javascript enabled:
This site uses javascript to make the magic happen.
Please turn on javascript and reload this page, or use a more current browser (like Firefox)

You might also like these games:
MLB Retired Jerseys	Opening Day Lineups: Cardinals	Opening Day Lineups: Rangers

There are 5 comments for this game.
(Warning: comments may contain spoilers)

MLB WAR Top Ten Since 1990 Quiz

by AlexMurillo

Created Sep 17, 2012 in Sports
Game Plays 1,139

Friend Scores and Standings

Loading friend results....

Top Games Today in Sports

Top Games with Similar Tags

Top User Games in Sports

	deej:	Sep 18th, 2012 at 04:58 GMT		12 points
	wat. this is an absolute train wreck. please reorganize it and try again. Here's what you do: 1) in the left column, just put the year and nothing else, you don't need to put the order number or anything. Also you don't need to say there was a tie, first of all there is most likely not a tie since WAR goes to a very precise number of decimal places, it just gets truncated at one by custom but they are very likely not true ties; second we can tell there is a tie if the numbers are the same. 2) In the right column, I would consider putting the team rather than position. This is less important, but it is more in line with sporcle custom. 3) go into style and select Group Answers with Same Hint to 5 columns. The quiz will look much better. I would also strongly recommend against including 2012 until after the season is over, since the data will literally be wrong tomorrow.

	mraithel13:	Sep 18th, 2012 at 05:30 GMT		6 points
	I agree. This is a great quiz, it just needs some re-formatting.

	stchoo:	Sep 18th, 2012 at 15:42 GMT		5 points
	Great idea.....serious need of some formatting help.

	applatt:	Sep 18th, 2012 at 23:24 GMT		2 points
	In regards to 2012 stats, just include the date you last updated the quiz (so it is not wrong the day after, as the comment above by deej noted). Also, I personally would prefer teams over positions as well.

	AlexMurillo:	Sep 19th, 2012 at 16:54 GMT		2 points
	OK I'll go teams...good call. I originally went position, then team, but it was a little too easy. And as far as the formatting of the quiz, sorry about that guys...I'm relatively new to the site and haven't figured out all the ins and outs of creating a quiz.